Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlGetBoundingBox"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: I did some tests for a reliable "avatar out of sim" check, trying to find a way around the usual cache time on things like llKey2Name. llGetBoundingBox reports an empty list if the avatar ...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I did some tests for a reliable "avatar out of sim" check, trying to find a way around the usual cache time on things like llKey2Name.
I did some tests for a reliable "avatar out of sim" check, trying to find a way around the usual cache time on things like llKey2Name.
llGetBoundingBox reports an empty list if the avatar is out of cache (as expected and described on LSL Wiki). But surprisingly, it reports  <-0.100000, -0.100000, -0.100000> <0.100000, 0.100000, 0.100000> for an avatar out of sim, but still within the usual cache period. Is this "official", reliable behaviour? --[[User:Tali Rosca|Tali Rosca]] 23:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
llGetBoundingBox reports an empty list if the avatar is out of cache (as expected and described on LSL Wiki). But surprisingly, it reports  <-0.100000, -0.100000, -0.100000> <0.100000, 0.100000, 0.100000> for an avatar out of sim, but still within the usual cache period. Is this "official", reliable behaviour? --[[User:Tali Rosca|Tali Rosca]] 23:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
== "The bounding box of an avatar sitting on an object includes that object." ==
They were talking about changing this (saw it somewhere on jira... or maybe I misread that jira). -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 04:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:07, 25 January 2010

I did some tests for a reliable "avatar out of sim" check, trying to find a way around the usual cache time on things like llKey2Name. llGetBoundingBox reports an empty list if the avatar is out of cache (as expected and described on LSL Wiki). But surprisingly, it reports <-0.100000, -0.100000, -0.100000> <0.100000, 0.100000, 0.100000> for an avatar out of sim, but still within the usual cache period. Is this "official", reliable behaviour? --Tali Rosca 23:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

"The bounding box of an avatar sitting on an object includes that object."

They were talking about changing this (saw it somewhere on jira... or maybe I misread that jira). -- Strife (talk|contribs) 04:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)