Difference between revisions of "Project:Editing Discussion/Archive 02"
m |
(→Synchronisation 'mirror' wikis: answered a question) |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
I've noticed that the so called 'mirror' wiki's offer differend kinds and depth of information among themselves. | I've noticed that the so called 'mirror' wiki's offer differend kinds and depth of information among themselves. | ||
Is an actual 'synchronisation' wanted and/or possible? --[[User:Vernes Veranes|Vernes Veranes]] 17:19, 2 June 2007 (PDT) | Is an actual 'synchronisation' wanted and/or possible? --[[User:Vernes Veranes|Vernes Veranes]] 17:19, 2 June 2007 (PDT) | ||
;Answer | |||
:The other Wikis started life as LSL Wikis. They might be considered mirrors of the LSL Portal here, except that the one here is woefully incomplete. | |||
:So long as this Wiki stays available, there is no need for a mirror, but if LL ever shuts it down, we might want to download a copy. |
Revision as of 10:40, 4 July 2007
This is an open forum for people to ask questions, ala the Wikipedia "Village pump". Feel free to add your comments below.
What should this be called?
I used "Village pump" as a working name. If it sticks, that's fine. I thought about using a Second Life themed name (e.g. The Telehub), but then realized that there could be confusion between that page and a future Telehub page which actually describes what Telehubs are. Maybe the "Hippo Pond"? -- Rob Linden 18:29, 13 May 2007 (PDT)
- That names sounds ok, but what should the namespace be? -- Strife Onizuka 18:44, 13 May 2007 (PDT)
- I'm using the same guidelines as other wikis (like Wikipedia's village pump, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project:Village_pump ), though I'll admit it's a little confusing in this case. One really irritating thing about MediaWiki is that it assumes that the name of the wiki ("Second Life Wiki") is a term that is appropriate to use as a namespace identifier, because it works for Wikipedia. So, we either have to shorten the name of the wiki ("SLWiki", which I think was already being used by someone else), or use "Project". I opted for the latter in configuring this wiki. -- Rob Linden 10:55, 14 May 2007 (PDT)
Guidelines
Given past experiences with the forums, some moderation will need to be done. -- Strife Onizuka 18:44, 13 May 2007 (PDT)
I suggest keeping it simple. If it is the only SL Forum call it 'SL Forum'. If it is the SL People's Forum then call it that.Errol Carter
Purpose
How does this 'forum' differ from the Second Life Forum? (except that this one is accessable by free-accounts)--Vernes Veranes 18:14, 1 June 2007 (PDT)
- This is specifically a place to discuss the wiki itself, not Second Life generally. -- Rob Linden 18:19, 1 June 2007 (PDT)
Policy Section
- To discuss existing and proposed policies
- Licensing
- Q. Residents have begun to share sculpt maps, textures, and sculpted prims on the wiki. According to the General Disclaimer, "Linden Lab will make your contribution available under the Creative Comments (sic) Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 license". (cf. Contribution Agreement and the Copyrights Project). Will residents be able to choose other licenses (a different Creative Commons license, GPL, or the Free Art License for example) if they wish to do so? — Yuu Nakamichi 01:08, 4 June 2007 (PDT)
Synchronisation 'mirror' wikis
I've noticed that the so called 'mirror' wiki's offer differend kinds and depth of information among themselves. Is an actual 'synchronisation' wanted and/or possible? --Vernes Veranes 17:19, 2 June 2007 (PDT)
- Answer
- The other Wikis started life as LSL Wikis. They might be considered mirrors of the LSL Portal here, except that the one here is woefully incomplete.
- So long as this Wiki stays available, there is no need for a mirror, but if LL ever shuts it down, we might want to download a copy.