Difference between revisions of "User talk:Celierra Darling"
Gigs Taggart (talk | contribs) (flexi-sculptie) |
Alissa Sabre (talk | contribs) (Re: Section titles) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
: I have no idea what the context of this is... :P [[User:Celierra Darling|Celierra Darling]] 21:55, 25 June 2007 (PDT) | : I have no idea what the context of this is... :P [[User:Celierra Darling|Celierra Darling]] 21:55, 25 June 2007 (PDT) | ||
:: It was about the sculptie-prim faq edit revert. [[User:Gigs Taggart|Gigs Taggart]] 15:00, 26 June 2007 (PDT) | :: It was about the sculptie-prim faq edit revert. [[User:Gigs Taggart|Gigs Taggart]] 15:00, 26 June 2007 (PDT) | ||
== Re: Section titles == | |||
Thank you for the [[User talk:Alissa Sabre#Section titles|feedback]] on my edit. I know some MediaWiki-based site is run under the policy to avoid the first level section headings, but I don't think it is not for SL wiki, because (1) the stylesheet for SL wiki seems preventing use of third or more levels (i.e., "===") (and I'm actually trying to avoid them as much as I can) and it is almost impossible to have just one level of section title, and (2) Some pages written by Lindens use the first level section title. Also, I believe it's not bad to use the same formatting for page title and the section title, because the page title and the first level section title are easily identified by the position in the page, even if their styles are same. Do you have any other reason why we should not use the first level section title? -- [[User:Alissa Sabre|Alissa Sabre]] 08:36, 12 October 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 07:36, 12 October 2007
(You can also leave messages here.)
Penises
All technology is just satisfying the innate human desire to make a more perfect penis. :P Gigs Taggart 14:06, 2 May 2007 (PDT)
- I have no idea what the context of this is... :P Celierra Darling 21:55, 25 June 2007 (PDT)
- It was about the sculptie-prim faq edit revert. Gigs Taggart 15:00, 26 June 2007 (PDT)
Re: Section titles
Thank you for the feedback on my edit. I know some MediaWiki-based site is run under the policy to avoid the first level section headings, but I don't think it is not for SL wiki, because (1) the stylesheet for SL wiki seems preventing use of third or more levels (i.e., "===") (and I'm actually trying to avoid them as much as I can) and it is almost impossible to have just one level of section title, and (2) Some pages written by Lindens use the first level section title. Also, I believe it's not bad to use the same formatting for page title and the section title, because the page title and the first level section title are easily identified by the position in the page, even if their styles are same. Do you have any other reason why we should not use the first level section title? -- Alissa Sabre 08:36, 12 October 2007 (PDT)