Difference between revisions of "Talk:LSL Protocol/Restrained Love Open Relay Group/x-tensions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Satomi Ahn (talk | contribs) (New page: About !x-listen: is it really useful when it would be enough to listen only to the victim's relay, and for the victim's relay to listen only to the controlling device? Note that this would...) |
Satomi Ahn (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Note that this would only make sense with a mono-device relay, as a multi one would still have to listen to everything on RLVR channel. | Note that this would only make sense with a mono-device relay, as a multi one would still have to listen to everything on RLVR channel. | ||
--[[User:Satomi Ahn|Satomi Ahn]] 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | --[[User:Satomi Ahn|Satomi Ahn]] 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Answering to myself: yes it makes sense, as this very relay session won't spam other devices during that time. This could become really efficient against lag if this becomes majoritary. This should definitely be proposed to the standard protocol as mandatory for 1.050. --[[User:Satomi Ahn|Satomi Ahn]] 10:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:00, 19 May 2009
About !x-listen: is it really useful when it would be enough to listen only to the victim's relay, and for the victim's relay to listen only to the controlling device? Note that this would only make sense with a mono-device relay, as a multi one would still have to listen to everything on RLVR channel. --Satomi Ahn 10:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- Answering to myself: yes it makes sense, as this very relay session won't spam other devices during that time. This could become really efficient against lag if this becomes majoritary. This should definitely be proposed to the standard protocol as mandatory for 1.050. --Satomi Ahn 10:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)