Difference between revisions of "Talk:AWG Domain rationale discussion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I have a hard time with the current listed set of domains. A set of components is, not at all a domain. A domain might be "all Linden Labs trusted servers which use lightweight capabilitie...) |
Dzonatas Sol (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Zha Ewery|-Zha]] | [[User:Zha Ewery|-Zha]] | ||
The examples you gave are specific to a web domain and are an implementational detail. What I listed are components of the architectural domain. [[User:Dzonatas Sol|Dzonatas Sol]] 15:44, 17 October 2007 (PDT) |
Revision as of 14:44, 17 October 2007
I have a hard time with the current listed set of domains. A set of components is, not at all a domain. A domain might be "all Linden Labs trusted servers which use lightweight capabilities within the LL firewall to manage trust" a domain might be "A set of asset, simulation and region servers which share a single trust domain"
The examples you gave are specific to a web domain and are an implementational detail. What I listed are components of the architectural domain. Dzonatas Sol 15:44, 17 October 2007 (PDT)