Talk:KB2Wiki Pilot

namespace name

Wouldn't "Linden Lab" or even "LL" convey sufficient meaning? "Linden Lab Official" would make urls be rather long when they appear in the address bar (use of URL shortening services is irrelevant in this case).

Since there is no existing "Linden Lab" or "LL" namespace, appending "Official" is entirely superfluous.

SignpostMarv Martin 22:02, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

I'd second this remark.

I don't think that "LL" would be intuitive for most, though naming the namesape "Linden Lab" or even "Official", could be better.

A namespace with the name "Official" inside the SL Wiki would automatically indicate that it is "Linden Lab Official". And it would be shorter.

-- Lynch ^{(talk|contribs)} 22:40, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

The KB2Wiki Migration Team discussed this at length — we know technically savvy folks like you would "get it", but there are many beginners who'd benefit from the clarification. This also includes outside traffic we'll get from non-Residents via Google and other sources. "Linden Lab" by itself is too vague, and "Official" — from who?

If a page name is too long, you can create a redirect or use an URL shortener like http://tr.im - Torley on 2009-06-24 @ 11:38 AM PST

"Official from who?" would be a legetimate question, though it wouldn't need to be answered within the URL. I noticed that Rand created this header and footer and suppose it will be (automatically?) added to articles within the namespace, containing the information. I think that the header answers that question :-)

-- ^{(talk|contribs)} 19:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Review

Review is happening automatically for administrators when they create pages. See Special:Log/review.
-- ^{(talk|contribs)} 15:31, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

PS: People become auto promoted to editors when they... Do what? *confused* Can't be the edit count, or at least Strife would be in the group as well. But according to the user list, I seem to be the only one (by now).
I gained the status after performing this test edit to check if the flagged revs was kicking in where it wasn't supposed to. Please note that I didn't review that page. I gained the status afterwards. It was already reviewed from the start.

-- ^{(talk|contribs)} 15:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

THANKS for catching this, Kate let me know and we're on it now. - Torley on 2009-06-25 @ 9:07 AM PST