Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mono"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jana Kamachi (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::::Agreed! We would be able to leverage so much more from the sad 16kb we get if we could do address operations and pass by reference. Oh, a second question there. Will the maximum size of scripts be increased? [[User:Jana Kamachi|Jana Kamachi]] 09:55, 26 January 2008 (PST) | ::::Agreed! We would be able to leverage so much more from the sad 16kb we get if we could do address operations and pass by reference. Oh, a second question there. Will the maximum size of scripts be increased? [[User:Jana Kamachi|Jana Kamachi]] 09:55, 26 January 2008 (PST) | ||
:::::I don't know. One advantage of the new system is that script asset transfers will be faster for the vast majority of script, they won't be statically allocated to 16kb. This means sim crossings should be faster. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 15:56, 26 January 2008 (PST) | |||
==Compile Data Flow== | ==Compile Data Flow== | ||
Revision as of 15:56, 26 January 2008
Other languages
Here's a question about mono that the article doesn't address: Will scripters be limited to LSL or will they be able to code in C# or something else more Mono-like? --Steamy Latte 12:20, 22 January 2008 (PST)
- Until LL can ensure that Mono is properly sandboxed and secure, the compiler will remain server side and the only language available will be LSL. -- Strife Onizuka 12:40, 23 January 2008 (PST)
- That makes total sense. Your comment does make it sound like there's a future plan to add other languages, after adequate testing has taken place. If so it's good news, as LSL lacks OOP and is cumbersome by comparison. --Steamy Latte 09:53, 24 January 2008 (PST)
- In 16k you don't want OOP. Trust me. The overhead would be killer. I just want pass by reference. Pass by value is the worst feature of LSO. If I had to guess I would say that most of speed improvements come from pass by reference alone. -- Strife Onizuka 17:19, 24 January 2008 (PST)
- Agreed! We would be able to leverage so much more from the sad 16kb we get if we could do address operations and pass by reference. Oh, a second question there. Will the maximum size of scripts be increased? Jana Kamachi 09:55, 26 January 2008 (PST)
- I don't know. One advantage of the new system is that script asset transfers will be faster for the vast majority of script, they won't be statically allocated to 16kb. This means sim crossings should be faster. -- Strife Onizuka 15:56, 26 January 2008 (PST)
Compile Data Flow
Can someone describe the way the current flow works, and how the new flow will contrast. That is, I think at present:
- You edit on the viewer.
- When you [save], the source is uploaded.
- A compiler in the viewer creates bytecode.
- The bytecode is uploaded.
Is this correct? How will this change, if at all? Lee Ponzu 09:20, 26 January 2008 (PST)