Difference between revisions of "Talk:Source downloads"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Only whole article editable due to __NOEDITSECTION__: removed __NOEDITSECTION__ from article)
Line 109: Line 109:


Is there a particular reason why this article has <code><nowiki>__NOEDITSECTION__</nowiki></code> in its source? If not I'll remove that, as editing only single sections is usually a useful option.--[[User:Boroondas Gupte|Boroondas Gupte]] 23:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Is there a particular reason why this article has <code><nowiki>__NOEDITSECTION__</nowiki></code> in its source? If not I'll remove that, as editing only single sections is usually a useful option.--[[User:Boroondas Gupte|Boroondas Gupte]] 23:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
:Done. --[[User:Boroondas Gupte|Boroondas Gupte]] 13:27, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:27, 1 April 2010

Some random comments

Download of libraries isn't working anymore??? It just leads to http://secondlifegrid.net/programs/open_source "Code Download" there leads back to this Wiki. --Shiva Aabye 00:02, 04 Sept 2007 (CET +1)

Thanks. Bugging internally. In the future, this sort of thing would best go on the JIRA. --Soft Linden 15:08, 4 September 2007 (PDT)

When the source of libllmozlib will be released? I want it for x86_64. http://ubrowser.com/downloads.php does not want to compile for linux. --terrex 07:34, 19 July 2007 (PDT)


I hope the source for 1.17.2.0 gets released soon. Developing around that crash-on-edit bug is awful. :(

Squash Otoro 16:06, 27 June 2007 (JPN Time)


It would be nice if there was a column indicating which of the downloads can no longer connect to the grids.

Stevex Janus 09:53, 8 June 2007 (PDT)


When the source of 1.16.0.6 will be available for download? Thanks. --Terrex Vieria 05:02, 3 June 2007 (PDT)

1.16.0.6 is a small change to add Korean support. For now you can click through the upgrade prompt. 1.17 is already blogged about. If you need the source for Korean support, I suggest to wait for 1.17 sources. Dzonatas Sol 12:33, 3 June 2007 (PDT)
Ok Thanks, I did not know about that minor change. I will await. --Terrex Vieria 04:37, 7 June 2007 (PDT)

Ok...I'm hoping to find an eager developer to update the table with new releases, because I have a ton of them:


There are three releases:

  • "1.13.2.15" off of the Branch_1-13-2 branch (where our official releases come from)-done
  • "20070126a" off of the "release" branch -done
  • "FL-1.13.2.27" off of the beta-1-14-0 branch (where the First Look viewer comes from)- is 1.13.2.27 does not refer to a valid file.?

Could someone update the table? The file names are entirely predictable based on the source names above. Bonus points for devising a MediaWiki template for making updates easier. -- Rob Linden 15:18, 26 January 2007 (PST)


Slightly Reformatted the table, added a template for doing rows: Template:SourceArchiveRow

Usage: {{SourceArchiveRow|date|branch|version}}

Example: {{SourceArchiveRow|2007-Jan-19|Branch_1-13-2 (r56958), last synced with release at r56659 |1.13.2.12}}

Note: Date can be in several formats, including ~~~~~ which inserts the current date, and time

--Thraxis Epsilon 17:31, 26 January 2007 (PST)


Excellent work! Thanks Thraxis and Jesse! -- Rob Linden 23:58, 26 January 2007 (PST)

Checksums for this release

I'll probably need to figure out where to upload these. In the meantime, here are the checksums - Rob Linden 01:19, 27 January 2007 (PST)

  • 1.13.2.15
    • 94705bd49fc1334d0317b1b3da6c515f slviewer-darwin-libs-1.13.2.15.tar.gz
    • e21851dd816b05f96a4a42a47abbe62b slviewer-linux-libs-1.13.2.15.tar.gz
    • 381d257f6bc94d8a9c0eb12fc020b11c slviewer-src-1.13.2.15.tar.gz
    • 11f08168c4dd795d3fdb13080d743c37 slviewer-src-1.13.2.15.zip
    • fb6396984b6bb0c4a072b17fe60d3f4f slviewer-win32-libs-1.13.2.15.zip
  • 20070126a
    • 08dc065b5c25213064faef6823f36200 slviewer-darwin-libs-20070126a.tar.gz
    • 5a506f1d3568f84e44aa992d2800b79b slviewer-linux-libs-20070126a.tar.gz
    • e7293c7db01c436e63fc14e9bbbe2dd4 slviewer-src-20070126a.tar.gz
    • 017b9b4c0497d268d5d38e9f6f6f00ec slviewer-src-20070126a.zip
    • df9bb4d07be5857f5df68644d9247e4d slviewer-win32-libs-20070126a.zip
  • FL-1.13.2.57209
    • f401e53dc967ea92be219bed2d572091 slviewer-darwin-libs-FL-1.13.2.57209.tar.gz
    • 351b8907df025968ea29d565b3e96ca0 slviewer-linux-libs-FL-1.13.2.57209.tar.gz
    • 6f499798469b46f8109b6297f327ca07 slviewer-src-FL-1.13.2.57209.tar.gz
    • e3ceddcf82b4280b1fb12841fe6912d9 slviewer-src-FL-1.13.2.57209.zip
    • dbac0acd64a75417881d464d4f10423d slviewer-win32-libs-FL-1.13.2.57209.zip

Time for a formatting refresh?

We're probably due for splitting out a Source download archive page, and perhaps refreshing the format. I'd like to make sure adding new releases is a very low maintenance exercise, but otherwise, there's a lot of latitude to futz. Anyone care to take on a redesign? -- Rob Linden 17:52, 26 November 2007 (PST)

How about a link at the end of each section (as the list/table currently is)... a "more" button? Clicky on the "more" then takes clicker to the archive page at the releated section. Repeat as needed for pages and pages of the tables. ??? Dzonatas Sol 20:58, 26 November 2007 (PST)
I'd make a page for each major version and put all the dated snapshots on a dedicated page. The current versions would be listed on this page. All the other pages would be nested pages. For example: Source downloads/1.18 -- Strife Onizuka 22:46, 26 November 2007 (PST)

Comments on table format

The table for download files has column headings on the first row (Date, Branch, Source, Artwork, Libs, Build Notes), but each cell for Source, Artwork and Libs contain "Source:", "Artwork", and "Libraries" as the first line. I have a feeling that it is a waste of table space. A better format may be something like:

Date Branch Source Artwork Libraries Build Notes

ver 1.XX.YY

(2009-May-02)
viewer-1.XX.YY (md5sums) Windows (CRLF)
Mac/Linux (LF)
All platforms Windows
Mac
Linux
This entry is just an example.

I know we need to update Template:SourceDownloadRowSnapshot to change the table format, but I think it's better to discuss this issue here. Thoughts?

--Alissa Sabre 05:24, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Only whole article editable due to __NOEDITSECTION__

Is there a particular reason why this article has __NOEDITSECTION__ in its source? If not I'll remove that, as editing only single sections is usually a useful option.--Boroondas Gupte 23:40, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Done. --Boroondas Gupte 13:27, 1 April 2010 (UTC)