Difference between revisions of "User:Strife Onizuka/Talkpage Archive 01"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::It's amazing what can be done with good documentation. MediaWiki is gold (just wish it was 1.9.x). | ::It's amazing what can be done with good documentation. MediaWiki is gold (just wish it was 1.9.x). | ||
::I was considering making some generic templates for function definition pages. Hasn't happened yet. And still have to make the templates for events. | ::I was considering making some generic templates for function definition pages. Hasn't happened yet. And still have to make the templates for events. | ||
::And I made a bit of a mess of the Template namespace (you can delete the | ::And I made a bit of a mess of the Template namespace (you can delete the redirecting pages). Getting out of the habit of using CamelCase is tough ~_~ [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 18:59, 27 January 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 18:59, 27 January 2007
Hi Strife....the term is "deprecated", not "depreciated". See "Deprecation" in Wikipedia -- Rob Linden 16:37, 27 January 2007 (PST)
- I was wondering about that. I'll change the template (it's handled in the template).Strife Onizuka 16:42, 27 January 2007 (PST)
- I'm still learning the ins and outs of MediaWiki, so these templates are moving along.Strife Onizuka 17:25, 27 January 2007 (PST)
- Excellent work on the templates. The pages look really good! -- Rob Linden 18:38, 27 January 2007 (PST)
- It's amazing what can be done with good documentation. MediaWiki is gold (just wish it was 1.9.x).
- I was considering making some generic templates for function definition pages. Hasn't happened yet. And still have to make the templates for events.
- And I made a bit of a mess of the Template namespace (you can delete the redirecting pages). Getting out of the habit of using CamelCase is tough ~_~ Strife Onizuka 18:59, 27 January 2007 (PST)