Difference between revisions of "Talk:LSL Functions by Subject"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I will continue the edit on my user page and will make it available when almost complete. [[User:Michele Wardark|Michele Wardark]] 5:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | I will continue the edit on my user page and will make it available when almost complete. [[User:Michele Wardark|Michele Wardark]] 5:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:You don't need to do that, it looked good. We didn't mean to scare you off or discourage you. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 05:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | :You don't need to do that, it looked good. We didn't mean to scare you off or discourage you. If we thought the information was sub-par we would have commented to that effect. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 05:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
:p.s. I would make the headers link to the categories. |
Revision as of 21:09, 22 February 2010
Categories?
Hm... What's the benefit of this article over categories? Having it all on one page? -- (talk|contribs) 01:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Don't forget that it isn't bugged like the categories. Course I pity the person who has to update it periodically (I'm not doing it). I wonder if I updated the static lists during the last function add? -- Strife (talk|contribs) 04:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm interested to have this map of LSL functions for my own. So why not create it here? I will continue the edit on my user page and will make it available when almost complete. Michele Wardark 5:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- You don't need to do that, it looked good. We didn't mean to scare you off or discourage you. If we thought the information was sub-par we would have commented to that effect. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 05:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- p.s. I would make the headers link to the categories.