Difference between revisions of "Talk:AW Groupies/Chat Logs/JoeLindenTPVBrownbag-2010-04-13"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Haven't you guys heard of reflow? Horizontal scrolling is a PITA. --[[User:TigroSpottystripes Katsu|TigroSpottystripes Katsu]] 23:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | Haven't you guys heard of reflow? Horizontal scrolling is a PITA. --[[User:TigroSpottystripes Katsu|TigroSpottystripes Katsu]] 23:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
: Thanx Kuraiko Yoshikawa for making things more readable :) --[[User:TigroSpottystripes Katsu|TigroSpottystripes Katsu]] 00:32, 15 April 2010 (UTC) | : Thanx Kuraiko Yoshikawa for making things more readable :) --[[User:TigroSpottystripes Katsu|TigroSpottystripes Katsu]] 00:32, 15 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
:: No Problem --[[User:Kuraiko Yoshikawa|Kuraiko Yoshikawa]] 00:41, 15 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:41, 14 April 2010
"Cost/Benefit" Debate?!
I cannot stress enough how infuriating the following comment by Joe Linden is (quoted from the transcript):
[12:21] [Voice Transcript] Joe Linden: we've ha a lot of internal debate around cost/benefit of OS
I'm sorry, but WHAT? Developers have spent hundreds, if not thousands of man-hours developing patches for Linden Lab FOR FREE, and they have the gall to question whether it's cost-effective? If there is truly such a debate going on, Linden Lab no longer deserves Open-Source community assistance. They can pay someone $100USD an hour for patches from now on for all I care. -- Fred Rookstown 17:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
the formating sucks
Haven't you guys heard of reflow? Horizontal scrolling is a PITA. --TigroSpottystripes Katsu 23:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanx Kuraiko Yoshikawa for making things more readable :) --TigroSpottystripes Katsu 00:32, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- No Problem --Kuraiko Yoshikawa 00:41, 15 April 2010 (UTC)