Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlSetDamage"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mako Nozaki (talk | contribs) |
Mako Nozaki (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
"If the object is not physical, the object will be damage enabled if it becomes physical; it will however not be physical while it is not damage enabled." | "If the object is not physical, the object will be damage enabled if it becomes physical; it will however not be physical while it is not damage enabled." | ||
... It sounds as if all physical objects have to be set damage enabled via llSetDamage... Anyone can rewrite or explain it so I can understand what these lines mean? | ... It sounds as if all physical objects have to be set damage enabled via llSetDamage... Anyone can rewrite or explain it so I can understand what these lines mean?--[[User:Mako Nozaki|Mako]] 08:00, 9 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:00, 9 May 2010
I deleted following sentence.
- If the object hits another object it will die.
This function seems to have nothing to do with object-to-object collisions. If the sentence is true, detailed conditions should be described, I think. --MasterOf Perl 14:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- It needs to be better written. It's why the world isn't riddle with bullets that didn't hit their targets. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 17:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- hmmm i see your point. I have expanded the article. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 17:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- Part of the problem is, I haven't really scripted any guns in... oh 5 years. And things have mostly likely changed. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 17:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
it will however not be physical while it is not damage enabled ... ?
"If the object is not physical, the object will be damage enabled if it becomes physical; it will however not be physical while it is not damage enabled." ... It sounds as if all physical objects have to be set damage enabled via llSetDamage... Anyone can rewrite or explain it so I can understand what these lines mean?--Mako 08:00, 9 May 2010 (UTC)