Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Portals"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:I don't mind it going either way. For [[:Category:LSL]], we do both but then there aren't that many articles in the base LSL category. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 07:23, 26 September 2008 (PDT) | :I don't mind it going either way. For [[:Category:LSL]], we do both but then there aren't that many articles in the base LSL category. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 07:23, 26 September 2008 (PDT) | ||
::Hm, ok. Think we'll leave it as is for now until more languages got a complete or almost complete set of portals. Then seperate it into subcats afterwards. You're also categorizing the redirects to the portals? [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 08:05, 26 September 2008 (PDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:05, 26 September 2008
Seperate languages?
While all other categories are trying to seperate languages, I guess this one is small enough so it can stay that way? Or should we add Category:Portals/nl, etc? 
Lynch (talk|contribs) 05:56, 26 September 2008 (PDT)
- I don't mind it going either way. For Category:LSL, we do both but then there aren't that many articles in the base LSL category. -- Strife (talk|contribs) 07:23, 26 September 2008 (PDT)