Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlSetMemoryLimit"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Agreed! Mono bytecode is too fat for such applications. -- [[User:Michelle Resistance|Michelle Resistance]] 22:15, 25 September 2011 (PDT) | Agreed! Mono bytecode is too fat for such applications. -- [[User:Michelle Resistance|Michelle Resistance]] 22:15, 25 September 2011 (PDT) | ||
:I was initially inclined to disagree but a look at my notes on LSO indicate otherwise. 1k would be enough for quite a lot. Naturally you would have to drop any e event that was going to max out it's memory. -- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 18:51, 26 September 2011 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:51, 26 September 2011
I would love to be able to call llSetMemoryLimits on an LSO script, even if it caused a script restart (which it probably would). Given the relatively compact nature of LSO, I bet you could do a lot of useful stuff in 1k or less. -- Argent Stonecutter 01:07, 10 August 2011 (PDT)
Agreed! Mono bytecode is too fat for such applications. -- Michelle Resistance 22:15, 25 September 2011 (PDT)