Talk:LlLinkParticleSystem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pedro Oval (talk | contribs) Specification wrong |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{quotation|Defines a particle system that sets the state of the particle emitter within '''the prim which the script is contained'''. Any other '''scripts in the same prim''' which call this function will modify the state of the same particle emitter.}} | {{quotation|Defines a particle system that sets the state of the particle emitter within '''the prim which the script is contained'''. Any other '''scripts in the same prim''' which call this function will modify the state of the same particle emitter.}} | ||
This only applies to llParticleSystem, but is plain wrong for llLinkParticleSystem. They should have separate texts. Can someone with a better understanding of the template structure fix this? --[[User:Pedro Oval|Pedro Oval]] 03:33, 22 December 2012 (PST) | This only applies to llParticleSystem, but is plain wrong for llLinkParticleSystem. They should have separate texts. Can someone with a better understanding of the template structure fix this? --[[User:Pedro Oval|Pedro Oval]] 03:33, 22 December 2012 (PST) | ||
:I've moved the offending text into the main article (though it gets fed to the template). There may be similar text elsewhere that needs correcting.-- '''[[User:Strife_Onizuka|Strife]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Strife_Onizuka|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Strife_Onizuka|contribs]])</small></sup> 18:08, 22 December 2012 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 19:08, 22 December 2012
Specification wrong
The Specification starts with this text (bolding mine):
Defines a particle system that sets the state of the particle emitter within the prim which the script is contained. Any other scripts in the same prim which call this function will modify the state of the same particle emitter.
This only applies to llParticleSystem, but is plain wrong for llLinkParticleSystem. They should have separate texts. Can someone with a better understanding of the template structure fix this? --Pedro Oval 03:33, 22 December 2012 (PST)