Difference between revisions of "Category talk:LSL Flow Control"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Turns the question around: Why doesn't this category need the LSL prefix. | :Turns the question around: Why doesn't this category need the LSL prefix. | ||
:It comes down to aesthetics. There aren't any technical reasons. When looking at the category list it makes it easy to find LSL categories. Searching for LSL categories is difficult. | :It comes down to aesthetics. There aren't any technical reasons. When looking at the category list it makes it easy to find LSL categories. Searching for LSL categories is difficult. It makes enumeration easier. [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 10:01, 23 February 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 23 February 2007
LSL Prefix
Question: Does this category need the LSL prefix. SignpostMarv Martin 09:47, 23 February 2007 (PST)
- Turns the question around: Why doesn't this category need the LSL prefix.
- It comes down to aesthetics. There aren't any technical reasons. When looking at the category list it makes it easy to find LSL categories. Searching for LSL categories is difficult. It makes enumeration easier. Strife Onizuka 10:01, 23 February 2007 (PST)