Difference between revisions of "Talk:Open Source Portal"
Solar Tone (talk | contribs) (Just wondering why X3D wasn't used to implement SL) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
== Just wondering why X3D wasn't used to implement SL == | |||
It may simply have been a matter of timing, but if there were other reasons I am interested in finding them out. | |||
Thanks. | |||
Revision as of 12:56, 11 March 2007
Nice to see the client open sourced.
Vicero Lambert: OMG I'M SO PUMPED!!!!! lol Thank you so much linden labs for releasing the viewer source :-D
Vincent Nacon: yay.... open source... but, I don't see anyone actually talking about "doing" something with it at the moment.
I guess I'll just pop the balloons and get on with it. So we need something to focus on one idea at a time. I bet some of you would say "let's fix all their stupid bugs/glitches", but let's not jump on too soon since you guys may have no clue what is causing them. Best to work on something to add in, in meanwhile, we may understand their source a little bit better before we're good enough to fix everything.
Let's try improving the inventory. Should be simple to tweak with, no?
Allow bigger and wider area along with a folder viewer to move things around more easily, something similar to Windows Explorer. Defines with arranging to a list, date/modified, tile, icons, or details.
I know some of you would suggest about thumbnails for textures... but that might be a bad idea, since it would force a bottleneck load of images coming in when viewing a very big folder of textures. Unless there's any way to control the detail level of load?
That's all from me now. Come jump in, kids.
Just wondering why X3D wasn't used to implement SL
It may simply have been a matter of timing, but if there were other reasons I am interested in finding them out.
Thanks.