Difference between revisions of "Category talk:LSL Functions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→deprecated) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==deprecated== | ==deprecated== | ||
Should deprecated functions be included in this list? Should we organize another list for ''active'' functions or something? I'm not sure how organizational stuff is done... --[[User:Anthony Reisman|Anthony Reisman]] 18:32, 16 March 2007 (PDT) | Should deprecated functions be included in this list? Should we organize another list for ''active'' functions or something? I'm not sure how organizational stuff is done... --[[User:Anthony Reisman|Anthony Reisman]] 18:32, 16 March 2007 (PDT) | ||
:I'm inclined to leave them listed, they are still in the compiler after all. The current list isn't optimal. It would be good to have a table with functions and a brief description. There are more important things that need to be done IMHO right now (like writing examples). [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 19:01, 16 March 2007 (PDT) |
Revision as of 19:01, 16 March 2007
P cont.
I can't edit this so whoever can needs to put P cont. instead of the P heading. Valence Sojourner 05:49, 5 March 2007 (PST)
deprecated
Should deprecated functions be included in this list? Should we organize another list for active functions or something? I'm not sure how organizational stuff is done... --Anthony Reisman 18:32, 16 March 2007 (PDT)
- I'm inclined to leave them listed, they are still in the compiler after all. The current list isn't optimal. It would be good to have a table with functions and a brief description. There are more important things that need to be done IMHO right now (like writing examples). Strife Onizuka 19:01, 16 March 2007 (PDT)