Difference between revisions of "Talk:Efficient Hex"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(if we reach a consensus that dividing Efficient Hex from hex is a step forward, then we should move all the talk of different unpersuasive ways to measure fast here, away from the Talk:Hex) |
m (clarify to "Not Much Talk Here Yet" from "Not Much Here Yet") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Not Much Here Yet = | = Not Much Talk Here Yet = | ||
We have been slow to conclude that we should divide the brief & clear & conventional exemplars at the [[hex]] article from the clever & small & fast exemplars of the [[Efficient Hex]] article. | We have been slow to conclude that we should divide the brief & clear & conventional exemplars at the [[hex]] article from the clever & small & fast exemplars of the [[Efficient Hex]] article. | ||
Revision as of 06:33, 29 October 2007
Not Much Talk Here Yet
We have been slow to conclude that we should divide the brief & clear & conventional exemplars at the hex article from the clever & small & fast exemplars of the Efficient Hex article.
We have now proposed dividing the one article in two. If we next reach a consensus that that division is a step forward, then of course we should move all the talk of different unpersuasive ways to measure fast to here, away from the Talk:Hex.
-- Ppaatt Lynagh 07:32, 29 October 2007 (PDT)