Difference between revisions of "Talk:History/Adult content"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Complete Re-Write: new section)
Line 5: Line 5:
:Yes, out-of-date stuff is best to be removed. Go for it :-)
:Yes, out-of-date stuff is best to be removed. Go for it :-)
:--[[File:Zai_signature.png|45px|link=User:Zai Lynch]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 00:04, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
:--[[File:Zai_signature.png|45px|link=User:Zai Lynch]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 00:04, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
== Complete Re-Write ==
The page was sufficiently out of date and not well organized, so I did a full re-write, including moving the questions to a separate FAQ page.  [[User:DanielRavenNest Noe|DanielRavenNest Noe]] 03:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:11, 26 June 2009

Obsolete questions and answers

The question about Not being able to have alcohol in PG areas is out of date, since the KB6010 definitions were revised after that. I assume edit policy on this page is to keep it current, so unless someone has a reason not to, I would remove that particular item DanielRavenNest Noe 23:09, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, out-of-date stuff is best to be removed. Go for it :-)
--Zai signature.png (talk|contribs) 00:04, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Complete Re-Write

The page was sufficiently out of date and not well organized, so I did a full re-write, including moving the questions to a separate FAQ page. DanielRavenNest Noe 03:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)