Difference between revisions of "Talk:SLSquid Proxy"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (unsigned)
Line 1: Line 1:
* I don't see the point of LL creating their own version of the commercial caching services that already exist. (unsigned)
I don't see the point of LL creating their own version of the commercial caching services that already exist. ??
{{unsigned|Argent Stonecutter|21:24, 9 July 2007}}


* Apart from taking development time and costing more, what is the advantage here? (unsigned)
Apart from taking development time and costing more, what is the advantage here?
{{unsigned|Argent Stonecutter|21:24, 9 July 2007}}


* There are also problems with enabling BitTorrent or similar P2P programs. Many ISP's see use of these programs as against their fair use policy and will restrict users available bandwidth if that traffic is present. (unsigned)
There are also problems with enabling BitTorrent or similar P2P programs. Many ISP's see use of these programs as against their fair use policy and will restrict users available bandwidth if that traffic is present.
{{unsigned|Fluf Fredriksson|13:28, 22 December 2007}}


* P2P, in this sense, is used pretty general. Even the Internet technology is P2P, so the ISPs attempt to narrow what P2P means is limited since they are also based on P2P. There has been some discussion on SLDev about the breadth of this kind of caching. [[User:Dzonatas Sol|Dzonatas Sol]] 08:30, 22 December 2007 (PST)
* P2P, in this sense, is used pretty general. Even the Internet technology is P2P, so the ISPs attempt to narrow what P2P means is limited since they are also based on P2P. There has been some discussion on SLDev about the breadth of this kind of caching. [[User:Dzonatas Sol|Dzonatas Sol]] 08:30, 22 December 2007 (PST)

Revision as of 12:03, 22 December 2007

I don't see the point of LL creating their own version of the commercial caching services that already exist. ?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added on 21:24, 9 July 2007 by Argent Stonecutter

Apart from taking development time and costing more, what is the advantage here? —The preceding unsigned comment was added on 21:24, 9 July 2007 by Argent Stonecutter

There are also problems with enabling BitTorrent or similar P2P programs. Many ISP's see use of these programs as against their fair use policy and will restrict users available bandwidth if that traffic is present. —The preceding unsigned comment was added on 13:28, 22 December 2007 by Fluf Fredriksson

  • P2P, in this sense, is used pretty general. Even the Internet technology is P2P, so the ISPs attempt to narrow what P2P means is limited since they are also based on P2P. There has been some discussion on SLDev about the breadth of this kind of caching. Dzonatas Sol 08:30, 22 December 2007 (PST)