Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlAxes2Rot"

Revision as of 05:02, 6 April 2008

"All three vectors must be mutually orthogonal unit vectors." contradicts the "two non-parallel vectors" assertion above which is much weaker. Or does this sentence refer to main text? In that case it should be moved upwards, to a
```
footnote
```
. -- Catherine Pfeffer

I also suggest to replace "non-parallel" with "non colinear" which is more correct mathematically. And perharps even with the stronger "orthogonal" requirement.-- Catherine Pfeffer

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
- * "All three vectors must be mutually orthogonal unit vectors."
+* "All three vectors must be mutually orthogonal unit vectors." contradicts the "two non-parallel vectors" assertion above which is much weaker. Or does this sentence refer to main text? In that case it should be moved upwards, to a <pre>footnote</pre>.  -- Catherine Pfeffer
-    contradicts the "two non-parallel vectors" assertion above which is much weaker.
-    Or does this sentence refer to main text? In that case it should be moved upwards.
-    -- Catherine Pfeffer
-* I also suggest to replace "non-parallel" with "non colinear" which is more correct mathematically.
+* I also suggest to replace "non-parallel" with "non colinear" which is more correct mathematically. And perharps even with the stronger "orthogonal" requirement.-- Catherine Pfeffer
-   And perharps even with the stronger "orthogonal" requirement.
-    -- Catherine Pfeffer