Difference between revisions of "Talk:AW Groupies/Chat Logs/JoeLindenTPVBrownbag-2010-04-13"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
("Cost/Benefit" Debate?!) |
m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[12:21] [Voice Transcript] Joe Linden: we've ha a lot of internal debate around cost/benefit of OS | [12:21] [Voice Transcript] Joe Linden: we've ha a lot of internal debate around cost/benefit of OS | ||
I'm sorry, but WHAT? Developers have spent hundreds, if not ''thousands'' of man-hours developing patches for Linden Lab '''FOR FREE''', and they have the gall to question whether it's cost-effective? If there is truly such a debate going on, ''Linden Lab no longer deserves Open-Source community assistance.'' They can pay someone $100USD an hour for patches from now on for all I care. -- [[User:Fred Rookstown|Fred Rookstown]] 17:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | I'm sorry, but WHAT? Developers have spent hundreds, if not ''thousands'' of man-hours developing patches for Linden Lab '''FOR FREE''', and they have the gall to question whether it's cost-effective? If there is truly such a debate going on, '''Linden Lab no longer deserves Open-Source community assistance.''' They can pay someone $100USD an hour for patches from now on for all I care. -- [[User:Fred Rookstown|Fred Rookstown]] 17:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:46, 14 April 2010
"Cost/Benefit" Debate?!
I cannot stress enough how infuriating the following comment by Joe Linden is (quoted from the transcript):
[12:21] [Voice Transcript] Joe Linden: we've ha a lot of internal debate around cost/benefit of OS
I'm sorry, but WHAT? Developers have spent hundreds, if not thousands of man-hours developing patches for Linden Lab FOR FREE, and they have the gall to question whether it's cost-effective? If there is truly such a debate going on, Linden Lab no longer deserves Open-Source community assistance. They can pay someone $100USD an hour for patches from now on for all I care. -- Fred Rookstown 17:44, 14 April 2010 (UTC)