Talk:LSL Language Test
<lsl> // post increment.
i = 1;
ensureIntegerEqual("i = 1; (i == 2) && (i++ == 1)", (i == 2) && (i++ == 1), TRUE);
// pre increment.
i = 1;
ensureIntegerEqual("i = 1; (i == 2) && (++i == 2)", (i == 2) && (++i == 2), TRUE);
// post decrement.
i = 2;
ensureIntegerEqual("i = 2; (i == 1) && (i-- == 2)", (i == 1) && (i-- == 2), TRUE);
// pre decrement.
i = 2;
ensureIntegerEqual("i = 2; (i == 1) && (--i == 1)", (i == 1) && (--i == 1), TRUE);</lsl>
These tests are good for LSO-LSL but do we want to propagate this order of execution to Mono-LSL? -- Strife Onizuka 19:16, 7 December 2007 (PST)