User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 21:41, 15 October 2007 diff hist +252 m Talk:Hex →Due Diligence: link with Efficiency Tester example of measuring speed by watching llGetTimestamp progress
- 21:32, 15 October 2007 diff hist +370 Talk:Hex →Due Diligence: yes consistently now, all five llGetFreeMemory LSO sizes reported in the article I now reproduce
- 21:24, 15 October 2007 diff hist +987 Talk:Hex →Due Diligence: sometimes 347, sometimes 351, is code space measure of first instance
- 21:13, 15 October 2007 diff hist +145 Talk:Hex I don't yet understand how the first copy occupies 351 bytes and subsequent copies occupy 347 bytes. Do you?
- 20:08, 15 October 2007 diff hist +1,508 m Talk:Hex →Due Diligence: ouch post the beginning of the delete experiment, not the end
- 20:07, 15 October 2007 diff hist +1,260 Talk:Hex claim 347 bytes of code space (not 351 like the article) reported by diff in llGetFreeMemory for the Correct-At-A-Glance code
- 19:37, 15 October 2007 diff hist +138 m Talk:Hex →Due Diligence: ouch sign all of that last round of changes
- 19:36, 15 October 2007 diff hist +898 Talk:Hex →Due Diligence: invite volunteers to decipher "loop cost", begin to decipher "LSO Size", decipher "ATM"
- 19:31, 15 October 2007 diff hist 0 m Talk:Hex sort the topics: active general-interest Due Diligence to the top, sleeping two-person-chat Consensus to the bottom
- 13:14, 15 October 2007 diff hist +379 m Talk:Hex Re claims of smaller/ faster - we now have numbers numbers numbers! Thank you to Strife.
- 21:13, 14 October 2007 diff hist +161 m Talk:Chatbot →News: - LSL_Protocol/ListMessage has code now - likely the seed of what will replace the first draft of the Chatbot current
- 21:12, 14 October 2007 diff hist +86 m Talk:Chatbot →Wishes: llGetSunDirection likely doesn't know if its owning or creating avatar sees World > Force Sun > Region Default
- 21:08, 14 October 2007 diff hist +2,226 LSL Protocol/ListMessage a first draft of an example of code that converts from string to call to result to string ...
- 20:59, 14 October 2007 diff hist +40 m LSL Protocol/ListMessage tweak to say 0 results, 1 result, or 2+N results representing a list of N results is the normal case, with the arbitrarily reserved <> result being the non-result of a meaningless verb
- 14:44, 14 October 2007 diff hist +9 m User:Ppaatt Lynagh →Thanks: linked with hex for its similar "correct at a glance" distinctive
- 14:42, 14 October 2007 diff hist +105 m User:Ppaatt Lynagh →Functions: link with the [[hex] page that explores the seemingly simple job of listing the hex nybbles of a signed integer
- 14:38, 14 October 2007 diff hist +2,481 m Talk:Hex →Our Growing Consensus: Thank you! divided into five replies
- 09:22, 14 October 2007 diff hist +396 Talk:Hex link with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_least_astonishment
- 09:16, 14 October 2007 diff hist +839 Talk:Hex due diligence in trading away correct at a glance in return for fast or small requires numbers, I think
- 09:03, 14 October 2007 diff hist +5,450 Talk:Hex answer delightfully much talk with much talk
- 07:40, 13 October 2007 diff hist +830 m Talk:Hex →First Talk: agree to disagree
- 07:28, 13 October 2007 diff hist +613 m Talk:Hex guess intent of last burst included Small and Different, with a claim of Easy To Call for all correctly understood conformant implementations
- 07:13, 13 October 2007 diff hist +181 m Hex →Design Rationale: restore some text lost without comment in the last couple of bursts of editing
- 07:11, 13 October 2007 diff hist +3 m Hex →Design Rationale: finish the job of moving the Why Multiple Implementations text far above
- 07:07, 13 October 2007 diff hist +506 Hex claim easy to call for all understood implementations, present fast vs. small neutrally, don't claim our inability to max all qualities is inescapable
- 06:34, 13 October 2007 diff hist +1,096 Talk:Hex →Second Talk: Surprise! From the community at large, we have more changes to review than yet talked of here or commented in the change history.
- 07:04, 12 October 2007 diff hist +69 m Talk:Hex →Second Talk: ouch return just to sign my comment with the dash dash squiggle squiggle squiggle squiggle
- 07:04, 12 October 2007 diff hist +249 m Talk:Hex good to hear looks good
- 09:52, 11 October 2007 diff hist +37 m Hex →Function: link the caveat re inconsistency in spec vs. implementation vs. sample results with the Talk:Hex page
- 09:49, 11 October 2007 diff hist +128 LlGetInventoryPermMask add note: In effect, the perms for code published in this LSL Wiki are PERM_COPY until you log in, then PERM_MODIFY or PERM_COPY.
- 09:42, 11 October 2007 diff hist −11 m Hex clarify - to Design Rationale from Specification By Consensus, to Why Python Hex Relevant from Python Hex Defined Where
- 09:39, 11 October 2007 diff hist +47 m Hex →Easy To Use, and Correct At A Glance: add the comment { bits2nybbles(value) == "" when (value == 0) }
- 09:27, 11 October 2007 diff hist +88 m Hex →Easy To Use, and Correct At A Glance: express if-else-if as if-else-if, not tuned for speed & size by omitting the else that follow return
- 09:22, 11 October 2007 diff hist +162 m Hex →Easy To Use, and Correct At A Glance: restore the IBM easy-to-read A B C D E F contrast with AT&T easy-to-type a b c d e f from the history of this article
- 09:19, 11 October 2007 diff hist +161 m Hex →Specification By Consensus: disentangle "why these implementations" from "Python Hex defined where" from "why multiple implementations"
- 09:12, 11 October 2007 diff hist −1 m Hex →Demo: spell check: to modern "show" from obsolete glass teletype "print"
- 09:09, 11 October 2007 diff hist +7 m Hex →Function: untangle "negative", "nonnegative", and "prefix"
- 09:08, 11 October 2007 diff hist +648 m Hex →Easy To Use, and Correct At A Glance: restore the implementation from the history of this article, tweaked to contrast most clearly with the other new implementations
- 09:07, 11 October 2007 diff hist +553 m Hex →Fast: restore the fast implementation from the history of this article, tweaked to contrast most clearly with the other new implementations
- 09:03, 11 October 2007 diff hist +1 m Hex →Function: clarify: speak of 1-7 as positive signed nybble vs. 8-F as unsigned nybble, do not mention octal
- 09:03, 11 October 2007 diff hist +1,134 m Hex →Demo: add the demo calls that produce the results
- 08:59, 11 October 2007 diff hist +269 m Hex →Demo: add the results that a New Script gives, including the astonishing -0x80000000 == 0x80000000 test case
- 08:54, 11 October 2007 diff hist +24 m Hex →See Also: link with llBase64ToInteger to show that exists to complete llIntegerToBase64 by gracefully doing nothing in combination
- 08:52, 11 October 2007 diff hist +475 Talk:Hex easy to use, else correct at a glance, else small, else fast may be only one of two schools participating here
- 08:47, 11 October 2007 diff hist +356 Hex try to capture all the Talk:Hex up thru now
- 07:08, 11 October 2007 diff hist +710 Talk:Hex add mention of people who write hex with leading zeroes, people who choose x or h, people who write lil- or big- endian
- 06:44, 11 October 2007 diff hist +3,215 Talk:Hex claim that those weird people who like signed integers do exist and do matter
- 21:59, 10 October 2007 diff hist +533 m LSL Protocol/ListMessage clarify - type out many more of the missing words
- 21:47, 10 October 2007 diff hist +1,542 Talk:Hex quote correct Python hex doc and correct lower case hex etymology from article history
- 21:36, 10 October 2007 diff hist +212 m User:Strife Onizuka/Talkpage Archive 01 Yes perfect, thank you, I see {{Jira|VWR-811}} = 'Repeated "else if" statements throw syntax error' with Mac OS X vs. Windows diff's noted