Talk:LlSensorRemove

Remove no_sensor() from example

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the example needed its no_sensor() event, since it was just setting up exactly the same repeating sensor that would fire anyway. It looks like a copy/paste mistake of a script that would normally use a regular llSensor() call.

Here it is in case I've missed something: <lsl> no_sensor()

   {
       llSensorRepeat("", "", AGENT, 5, PI, 1);
       //If agent is not in range of sensor, this will search the agent again.
   }</lsl>
-- Haravikk (talk|contribs) 10:03, 14 September 2012 (PDT)

We both will need correcting, I agree with you. At first I thought it was an example that was intended to use llSensor and not llSensorRepeat but then having the no_sensor event would essentially turn it into a llSensorRepeat with llRemoveSensor in the sensor statement (which it has). It looks like whoever upgraded the script forgot or didn't think to remove the no_sensor event. -- Strife ^{(talk|contribs)} 11:59, 14 September 2012 (PDT)