Localization Vendor Localizers JP
Localization of Second Life Work into Japanese
The purpose of this page is to facilate communication between Linden Lab and the Localizers Japanese team working on the localization of the SL Work project.
Please enter your question on this wiki and I will do my best to provide an answer!
- Question:
08/20/2009 Question about the use of "氏" by itself: In the Japanese translation of IBM case study, "氏" is sometimes used by itself, for instance, "氏のミッションは「さらにアクティブ且つ自主的に活動できるようIBMアカデミーを変換」させることで、<snip>" or "しかしVirtual World Conferenceに参加したすぐ後だったため、氏とリーダーシップ・チームは、大規模会議を現実世界で物理的に開く必要性はないと判断しました". In my opinion, this usage of "氏" is strange. Can I change it to "同氏" or "xxx (xxx=appropriate last name; in the above examples, Martin)氏"?
Answer:
- Question:
08/20/2009 Question about the gender specific pronoun "彼女": Again, in the IBM case study, suddenly "彼女" appears, for instance, "Joanne Martin氏は仮想会議の正当性について、全ては人と人が関わり合うこと、ネットワーキングである、と述べています。 それはIBMアカデミーのプレジデントとしての彼女のミッションであり、Second Lifeで彼女のビジョンが現実となったのです。" The use of this gender specific pronoun is very inconsistent with the rest of the case studies. Can I change it to "Martin氏"?
Answer:
- Question:
Question about the translation of Northrop Grumman: Of all the success stories, this company name is the only one (so far) that has been translated into katakana (ノースロップ・グラマン). Is this correct/preferred/intentional?
Answer: Yes, it is intentional. As their Japanese pages (this pdf for example) have the company name in Katakana with a dot in the middle, I followed it.
- Question:
Question about the usage of a dot (・) to separate katakana words: In some of the existing translations of success stories, dots are heavily used, for instance: ノースロップ・グラマン or マルチメディア・データ・ストリーミング. However, in some of the success stories (specifically, those I have translated), dots aren't used this way. Do we need to make the dot usage consistent across the case study text?
Answer: Thank you for bringing this to my attention. In reply, no, we don't need to. I've been following the usage of a dot the previous translation vendor was using in between Katakana. (We don't have their TM or Glossary) However I started feeling it's a bit too much to see dots all over the place, especially when there're many Katakana words in cases. I would like to shift towards minimum usage of dots within Katakana.
Thank you very much.