User:Zero Linden/Office Hours/2008 Jan 10
< User:Zero Linden/Office Hours
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Revision as of 01:39, 2 September 2008 by Saijanai Kuhn (talk | contribs) (User:Zero Linden/Office Hours/2007 Jan 10 moved to User:Zero Linden/Office Hours/2008 Jan 10: year was off-by-1)
Transcript of Zero Linden's office hours:
[8:36] | Harleen Gretzky: | He is typically late to his OH |
[8:37] | Rex Cronon: | also, there is only one transcript for the whole month of december:( |
[8:37] | Leffard Lassard: | = |
[8:37] | Zha Ewry: | Ah. |
[8:37] | Zha Ewry: | Zero's on |
[8:37] | Arawn Spitteler: | Ask/Nag when he shows |
[8:37] | Zha Ewry: | And there he is! |
[8:37] | Harleen Gretzky: | Hi Zero :) |
[8:38] | Arawn Spitteler: | All welcomes Zero |
[8:38] | Rex Cronon: | he is close, and i think he can hear |
[8:38] | AC: | Hi Zero ! |
[8:38] | Zha Ewry: | Morning Zero |
[8:38] | Zero Linden: | Gooooood morning all |
[8:38] | Rex Cronon: | hello zero |
[8:38] | Dr Scofield: | hi all |
[8:38] | Rex Cronon: | hi |
[8:38] | Tao Takashi: | Good morning, Zero |
[8:38] | Arawn Spitteler wonders if Vineland is using Havoc 4, and if Zero is the person Zarf would want to ask about strange phenomena. | |
[8:40] | Rex Cronon: | zero, is there an ATA for the transcripts, for december, and the one from tuesday? |
[8:40] | Wyn Galbraith: | Morning all. |
[8:40] | Rex Cronon: | hi |
[8:40] | AC: | hello Wyn |
[8:40] | Zero Linden: | Vineland is not using Havoc 4 as far as I (or Zarf) knows |
[8:40] | Zero Linden: | Rex... ETA? |
[8:40] | Rex Cronon: | eta* |
[8:41] | Rex Cronon: | sorry, seems like my fingers are a little slow today |
[8:41] | Zha Ewry: | Zero.. As I cover my white board with grids about trusted/untrusted sim/server relationships, do you want to consdier |
[8:41] | Arawn Spitteler: | Passive but Physical Object went off world, there. |
[8:41] | Zha Ewry: | agent domains seperate from regionas, or assume they come a a pair? |
[8:41] | Dr Scofield: | zha, why would they become a pair? |
[8:42] | Zha Ewry: | For simplicity |
[8:42] | Zha Ewry: | But. I assume they won't. |
[8:42] | Zha Ewry: | Just makes more cases |
[8:42] | Zha Ewry: | Raises questions like "Do we hand off agents from agent DomainX, to agent domainY" |
[8:42] | Zero Linden: | Well, Tree K. was putting up the transcripts for me --- |
[8:42] | Tao Takashi: | what does "hand off" mean? |
[8:42] | Arawn Spitteler wonders why replacement of one object would stop the Grid: The Grid is supposed to have some parrallel to The Internet, but the Internet was designed to recover ffrom a nuclear war. | |
[8:42] | Zero Linden: | I have the raw transcript for Dec., but (alas) without time stamps.... I'll put them up today |
[8:43] | Zero Linden: | Zha - I've always assumed that they don't |
[8:43] | Zero Linden: | come as pairs |
[8:43] | Tao Takashi: | I did put one up I had for Novermber I think |
[8:43] | Zha Ewry nods | |
[8:43] | Zha Ewry: | Okies |
[8:43] | Zha Ewry: | I'll do the full messy case then ;-) |
[8:43] | Zha Ewry mourns the last four sqaure inches of her whiteboard | |
[8:43] | Tao Takashi: | I think we need the full messy case ;-) |
[8:43] | Zero Linden: | I don't like the idea of enforcing that every AV should need an identity-fragment on an Agent Domain associated with a Region Domain that they want to visit |
[8:44] | Zha Ewry: | Nor do I. |
[8:44] | Zero Linden: | smacks too much of to sliding in to the current situation on the internet today |
[8:44] | Zha Ewry: | Just makes the picture a it middier |
[8:44] | Zha Ewry: | *muddier |
[8:44] | Dr Scofield: | eeek |
[8:44] | Zha Ewry: | I'm about 1/3 of the way from having a usefuil layout of the basic problems |
[8:44] | Zha Ewry: | So.. we can talk about what trust relationships we need in all the cases. |
[8:44] | Wyn Galbraith thinks Tree has been busy days as she is. | |
[8:44] | Tao Takashi: | I was trying to mention virtual worlds in the dataportability.org group btw ;-) so they think a bit further then just personal data but also content |
[8:45] | Zha Ewry: | Also raises some interesting questoins about what ahppens if we move scripts to agent domains |
[8:45] | Zero Linden: | I think, long term, that is inevitable |
[8:45] | Zha Ewry nods | |
[8:45] | Zha Ewry: | I agree |
[8:45] | Zha Ewry: | Which.. means we'll dcoument some fun things |
[8:45] | Zero Linden: | It is sort of like the inevitability of scripted IRC/Chat clients..... |
[8:45] | Tao Takashi: | you mean running scripts on agent domains and just getting object updates etc. from the region domain? |
[8:45] | Zero Linden: | at some point you are going to want to automate the way your avatar does some things.... |
[8:46] | Tao Takashi: | or are we talking about the client? |
[8:46] | Zha Ewry: | Region sims allowing aves in, are gong to have to also allow the agent domain to see some tihings for the scripts, in a sesnible way |
[8:46] | Zero Linden: | And again, I fear for the complexity, but I think that running attachment scripts in the AD will be a big win for usability |
[8:46] | Dr Scofield: | zero, why not do it via the client? |
[8:46] | Zha Ewry: | I tend to agree zero |
[8:46] | Dr Scofield: | for automation |
[8:46] | Zha Ewry: | And.. Actually, I think the complexity isn't that bad, because you shed a lot of complexity on the sim side |
[8:47] | Tao Takashi: | and won't scripts in AD add a lot more of network traffic? |
[8:47] | Zero Linden: | What advantage to on the client? Then your ability to do things depends you being on the right machine with teh right files? |
[8:47] | Zha Ewry: | You get much smoother handling of the hand offs |
[8:47] | Zero Linden: | or do we serve the scripts to the client? |
[8:47] | Zero Linden: | it does remove the one thing safe from poaching: scripts - since they are never sent to the client now |
[8:47] | Dr Scofield: | you could do that |
[8:48] | Tao Takashi: | I think we need both.. some client specific scripting and some server side. They might serve different purposes |
[8:48] | Rex Cronon: | the code, or the precompiled bytes? |
[8:48] | Dr Scofield: | i was thinking about autmating your avatar |
[8:48] | Dr Scofield: | not shipping the scripts for in-world objects, sorry |
[8:48] | Zero Linden: | Well - I suppose if the RD grants capabilities to the AD for passing events and commands from attachement scripts, then the |
[8:49] | Zero Linden: | AD could pass that capability on to the viewer along with the script and let the viewer run it.... |
[8:49] | Tao Takashi: | like clientside scripts might be like Firefox extensions |
[8:49] | Dr Scofield: | didn't mean to confuse |
[8:49] | Tao Takashi: | e.g. add IRC support as an example |
[8:49] | Tao Takashi: | but that's different from scripted attachments |
[8:49] | Zero Linden: | there is the issue of persisting the state of the script... especially when the connection between viewer and AD gets severed (say if the viewer crashes..... whcih I realize is a (cough)common(cough) event) |
[8:49] | Zha Ewry nods | |
[8:50] | Zha Ewry: | I think, in time, we'll have automatoin in both places |
[8:50] | Zha Ewry: | We *can't* stop client side automaion |
[8:50] | Dr Scofield: | yes...my comment related to automation of avatar via cleint |
[8:50] | Arawn Spitteler doesn't know AD from Client, but thinks straight Java could be used for Client Scripting. | |
[8:50] | Zha Ewry: | But.. we'll want AD automatoin |
[8:50] | Zero Linden: | Sigh - probably - and probably in a multitude of languages and lib frameworks.... |
[8:50] | Dr Scofield: | not in-world objects/attachments |
[8:50] | Zero Linden: | (AD = Agent Domain) |
[8:51] | Tao Takashi: | I would hope for it not being just Java ;-) |
[8:51] | Tao Takashi: | but anyway |
[8:51] | Dr Scofield: | ;-) |
[8:51] | Zha Ewry: | OK. So I'll try to habe a first draft tabele and summary in the wiki for Tuesday |
[8:51] | Kurt Stringer: | so there would be different scripts for prims and avatars? |
[8:51] | Zha Ewry: | *have even |
[8:51] | Kurt Stringer: | agent vs region? |
[8:51] | Arawn Spitteler: | Scale of Skill, Java for those expanding from Server Side LSL, and better for those who can actually program |
[8:51] | Zero Linden: | Don't know... |
[8:52] | Rex Cronon: | the problem will be than if the owner of the script trusts the creator |
[8:52] | Tao Takashi: | so if scripts are run on he agent domain, what would actually needed to be transferred? I guess scanner commands and such are simply sent to the region and some result comes back then |
[8:52] | Dr Scofield: | zero, could we discuss the secondlife:///app/login issue a bit? as neas pointed out on sldev this is the first cse where we actually run into issue re grid interop |
[8:52] | Zha Ewry: | The sense informaoin is the obvious big one |
[8:52] | Tao Takashi: | I can program but it's not better for me ;-) |
[8:52] | Tao Takashi: | but that's a discussion for later anyway |
[8:52] | Kri Ayakashi: | I believe that it won't be long before we'll see some custom clients with client side scripting... I'm actually suprised there aren't any out there yet |
[8:52] | Tao Takashi: | so what else do attachments actually do? |
[8:52] | Zha Ewry: | And.. this does, I think, imply, that scripts will be in at least two places |
[8:53] | Tao Takashi: | HTTP probably but there it doesn't matter from where it gets triggered |
[8:53] | Rex Cronon: | and java code can be decompiled quite easy, so can the creator trust the user? |
[8:53] | Zha Ewry: | Because, you'll have scripts in rezzed objects, whichh don't belong to agents |
[8:53] | Zero Linden: | hmmmm...... I was just thinking of generalizing the script interface so that one could have a script proxy on the sim for each attachemetn script (since they need to sense and interact with the sim environment) |
[8:53] | Zha Ewry: | So.. one imagines those get to run out of the agent domain |
[8:53] | Zero Linden: | but have all the events and calls proxyed to/from the script running on the Agent Domain (or Viwer) |
[8:53] | Zero Linden: | this should be a generalized facilty |
[8:53] | Zha Ewry: | (On the regions, or sepersate, doesn't much matter) |
[8:53] | Zha Ewry: | and.. Yes. |
[8:54] | Zha Ewry: | Because, if we decouple fully, we get ncier scaling |
[8:54] | Tao Takashi: | would a region then have a general e.g. sense API which I eventually can use completely free (without a script in an attachment)? |
[8:54] | Zero Linden: | it would allow you sell objects that had scripts where you didn't want the script to be out... and were willing to provide the compute power to run it |
[8:54] | Zero Linden: | hmmmmmmm. |
[8:54] | Zero Linden: | I'll talk to Babbage about this |
[8:54] | Tao Takashi: | this would mean sensors without actual objects around |
[8:54] | Saijanai Kuhn exepcts to be reading a lot to catch up | |
[8:54] | Zha Ewry: | Erk. |
[8:55] | Zha Ewry: | Interesting thing. The prims in the attachments are still goign to be on the region for people to see |
[8:55] | Zha Ewry: | HUD ones, no |
[8:55] | Zha Ewry: | HUD ones, are hidden |
[8:55] | Zha Ewry: | But.. the prims rez in the regoin, don't they? |
[8:55] | Tao Takashi: | well, do we need attachments then for these scripts if they don't show anything? ;-) |
[8:55] | Tao Takashi: | like twitterbox |
[8:55] | Zero Linden: | Tao - it might be a reasonable construction to enforce that anything that senses must be a script in an object (allows it to be governed by parcel controls, for example) |
[8:55] | Tao Takashi: | well, it shows something but it wouldn't need to |
[8:56] | Zha Ewry: | HUD attaches get interesting |
[8:56] | Tao Takashi: | I am just thinking loud not necessarily saying that it's a good idea |
[8:56] | Tao Takashi: | it might save prim count though |
[8:56] | Zero Linden: | but it could be that a kind of script is just a generic proxy connection that sends events via HTTP and gets functions to invoke from HTTP |
[8:56] | Zha Ewry likes the thinking out loud | |
[8:56] | Dr Scofield: | HUd attaches would be a good cse for AD |
[8:56] | Saijanai Kuhn: | so the case of attachments that are no permissions, but have scripts, will be handled differently than attachments WITH scripts... |
[8:56] | Saijanai Kuhn: | than attachments WITHOUT* scripts |
[8:56] | Zha Ewry scribbles on her white board | |
[8:56] | Tao Takashi: | so what else do attachments do? maybe rez something out of their inventory |
[8:57] | Neas Bade: | if the scripts were not too latency sensitive, it would be nice to allow the HTTP connections to be fully outside of grid |
[8:57] | Zha Ewry: | Animations |
[8:57] | Zha Ewry: | xmlrpc |
[8:57] | Zha Ewry: | (tho, we hoope that goes away) |
[8:57] | Zha Ewry: | chat |
[8:57] | Tao Takashi: | so why not simply serve attachments from the AD, too? |
[8:57] | Rex Cronon: | push |
[8:57] | Zero Linden: | Neas - absolutely |
[8:57] | Tao Takashi: | or are we saying this already? :) |
[8:57] | Kri Ayakashi: | while on topic of transfer protocols wouldn't it be better to use something like XMPP instead of HTTP for this? |
[8:57] | Zero Linden: | Tao - I think we are saying this |
[8:57] | Tao Takashi: | ok |
[8:57] | Neas Bade: | Kri, why XMPP? |
[8:58] | Zero Linden: | ditto? |
[8:58] | Kri Ayakashi: | for one latency and amount of data sent is smaller |
[8:58] | Kri Ayakashi: | it's a two-way protocol |
[8:58] | Wyn Galbraith's work has switched to days so she has to go to work now. | |
[8:58] | Neas Bade: | kri, you've been using bad http servers then :) |
[8:58] | Saijanai Kuhn: | Later Wyn |
[8:58] | Wyn Galbraith: | B-bye!!! :D |
[8:58] | Zha Ewry: | By Wynn |
[8:58] | Rex Cronon: | bye wyn |
[8:58] | Dr Scofield: | XMPP let's you deal better with async events |
[8:59] | Neas Bade: | getting low http latency and good http scalability is a pretty well understood solved problem |
[8:59] | Zero Linden: | Kri - it is true that XMPP is symetric, which is nice, but I don't think it's overhead is that much less than HTTP |
[8:59] | Zha Ewry: | OH! Before I foget, Zero, you might want to update your "hours" sign on the easel there. |
[8:59] | Neas Bade: | xmpp has some "fun" scaling issues that aren't all that well understood |
[8:59] | Neas Bade: | if you look at the xmpp spec, the overhead really is more |
[8:59] | Dr Scofield: | you only have to establish the connection once |
[8:59] | Zero Linden: | My biggest concern with XMPP is that it doesn't really have the wide tool support |
[8:59] | Dr Scofield: | then it's just XML messages |
[8:59] | Zha Ewry: | you'd have to do HTTP, I think |
[8:59] | Zha Ewry: | Becuase that's what eveything talks |
[9:00] | Neas Bade: | dr scofield, connection overhead shouldn't be that big a deal |
[9:00] | Zero Linden: | Well, the TCP handshake packets are a fart-in-a-whirlwind compared to the headers etc.... |
[9:00] | Zha Ewry and the acres of angle brackets | |
[9:00] | Zero Linden: | XMPP doesn't play well with most XML tools (as it sends fragments of XML documents) |
[9:00] | Neas Bade: | you can use keep alive and pipelining if you really think that it is causing issues |
[9:00] | Zha Ewry worries about the world wide angle bracket supply | |
[9:00] | Dr Scofield: | once you go for encrypted connection setup becomes expensive |
[9:00] | Neas Bade: | yeh, HTTP is simple and nice |
[9:00] | Zero Linden: | And there are many frameworks for serving XMPP |
[9:01] | Zero Linden: | The big plus for me is the symetric connection no matter which way established |
[9:01] | Saijanai Kuhn notes that the avatar domain attachements thing seems to have died. Too many variables, not enough info? | |
[9:01] | Tao Takashi: | XMPP gets mentioned more and more it seems |
[9:01] | Tao Takashi: | on the DiSo project they want to use that for contact detail updates |
[9:01] | Zha Ewry: | Neas, am I right in recalling there has been some discussion in OpenSim land, about breaking scripting out into seperate spaces? |
[9:01] | Zero Linden: | however, we've been doing some reasonable things with HTTP using the long poll technique |
[9:01] | Neas Bade: | Tao, but typically not by folks that actually have had to implement an XMPP server :) |
[9:02] | Kri Ayakashi: | you mean comet? |
[9:02] | Saijanai Kuhn: | Zero if you mean EventQueueGet, that's only "reasonable" if you're sure what is going on |
[9:02] | Tao Takashi: | Neas: They are actually implementing something for Wordpress right now |
[9:02] | Tao Takashi: | but I don't know the details |
[9:02] | Zero Linden: | sorry to open a fresh wound.... |
[9:02] | Dr Scofield: | neas, there are some decent XMPP servers around |
[9:03] | Neas Bade: | we did that discussion in OpenSim land regarding region comms a few months ago, and a bunch of folks from Intel with significant XMPP experience said "you really don't want to go there. Beyond a certain scaling factor things fall over, and no one has really sovled them yet" |
[9:03] | Tao Takashi: | well, comet also seems to grow slowly |
[9:03] | Neas Bade: | there is a reason that HTTP is used everywhere at this point, it is really well proven for all kinds of tasks |
[9:03] | Dr Scofield: | google seems to have |
[9:03] | Tao Takashi: | Neas: is this readable under some URL? :) |
[9:03] | Neas Bade: | check out the opensim-dev mailing list archives |
[9:04] | Tao Takashi: | thanks, will do |
[9:04] | Neas Bade: | http://opensimulator.org - follow links |
[9:04] | Neas Bade: | it would have been Octoberish IIRC |
[9:04] | Dr Scofield: | neas, that's just taking the "i've got a big hammer...and, oh, look, lots of nails here" approach |
[9:04] | Neas Bade: | Dr Scofield, perhaps, but you can't underestimate the power of using technologies people already know |
[9:05] | Zha Ewry shrugs | |
[9:05] | Zha Ewry: | "Big swiss army knife," |
[9:05] | Neas Bade: | you want to bring in developers to interlock with these bits |
[9:05] | Neas Bade: | and there are at least 100x more people that know HTTP than XMPP |
[9:05] | Saijanai Kuhn: | properly designed, this stuff should be changeable down the road, if need be... |
[9:06] | Saijanai Kuhn: | without HUGE hassles, even |
[9:06] | Kri Ayakashi: | that's true but I dont think it's a good argument why to use something or why not to use something |
[9:06] | Zero Linden: | Well, I'm equally concerned about things like - HTTP's failure modes are well understood - what happens when an XMPP connection drops? |
[9:06] | Neas Bade: | yep |
[9:06] | Dr Scofield: | true, i'm just concerned that we use HTTP for purposes it was never intended for |
[9:06] | Zero Linden: | Caching is possible in HTTP, but not XMPP |
[9:06] | Tao Takashi: | Well, I think I'd like HTTP more for that everybody knows it |
[9:06] | Neas Bade: | HTTP was intended for reading physics papers |
[9:07] | Dr Scofield: | pull |
[9:07] | Neas Bade: | so we all use HTTP for things it was never intended for :) |
[9:07] | Tao Takashi: | when I heard about XMPP I tried to read up upon it but stopped soon again as it seems a bit too read |
[9:07] | Dr Scofield: | but not push |
[9:07] | Zha Ewry shrugs "90% of the HTTP uses theseb days are well beyond Mosaic" | |
[9:07] | Tao Takashi: | well, it depends on how many people will do these things with it and servers/clients will simply evolve |
[9:07] | Dr Scofield: | ok, i'll shut up XMPP wise |
[9:08] | Zha Ewry: | Zero.. how many singletones are there in SL at this point, which won't surivive wihout pluatlity in an open Gridded environment? |
[9:08] | Zero Linden: | So - this has been tackled several times in HTTP: ModPubSub comes to mind and Rohit Khare's thesis ARREST - which is his pub/sub extention to REST |
[9:08] | Zero Linden: | Hmmm... F-Sharp above middle C? |
[9:08] | Neas Bade adds to his reading list | |
[9:09] | Tao Takashi: | sooo, if the attachments are on the AD, how would they be rendered on the client? |
[9:09] | Dr Scofield: | secondlife:///app/login? |
[9:09] | Tao Takashi: | the client directly gets them from the AD? or via the RD? |
[9:09] | Neas Bade: | yeh, the uri discussion is something I obviously have great interest in :) |
[9:10] | Zero Linden: | Tao - good question... don't know |
[9:10] | Zero Linden: | Dr - what are you asking? |
[9:10] | Neas Bade: | Zero, have you kept up on the sldev thread regarding secondlife:// uris? |
[9:10] | Zero Linden: | Zha - wouldn't it be easier to ask it the other way round? |
[9:10] | Tao Takashi: | of we assume bad RDs then AD => client would probably be better |
[9:10] | Dr Scofield: | the loginpage/web auth currently does not really return any information about the grid to connect to |
[9:10] | Zero Linden: | Neas - no |
[9:10] | Neas Bade: | it started from a discussion with Tess yesterday that Dr Scofield summarized |
[9:10] | Tao Takashi: | the client will get these things anyway |
[9:10] | Zha Ewry: | LOL |
[9:11] | Zha Ewry: | Possibly |
[9:11] | Tao Takashi: | and what about bad ADs? :) |
[9:11] | Zero Linden: | "Yo - I'm one baaad AD, ya hear?!" |
[9:11] | Saijanai Kuhn: | AD...? |
[9:11] | Zero Linden: | Agent Domain |
[9:11] | Tao Takashi: | I am not sure running scripts on ADs will solve the problem ;-) |
[9:11] | Tao Takashi: | if it's not the AD the script creator choose to trust |
[9:11] | Dr Scofield: | you can tell the latest clients to go your own loginpage, but all you can do in that is return the secondlife:/// URI |
[9:12] | Dr Scofield: | we discussed with tess how we could add the grid information |
[9:12] | Tao Takashi: | I wonder why the grid information cannot be simply in some config file on the FS |
[9:12] | Neas Bade: | right, the issue is that secondlife:/// uri like things have implicit hostname |
[9:12] | Dr Scofield: | (a) use a parameter like grid=..... |
[9:12] | Saijanai Kuhn: | Was that after the Groupies meeting, or another talk? |
[9:12] | Tao Takashi: | but then again I think I am not too much into the details of that problem |
[9:13] | Neas Bade: | and we really need that to be an explicit hostname to make it work well with multiple grids |
[9:13] | Saijanai Kuhn: | and did it get posted to the wiki? |
[9:13] | Dr Scofield: | (b) use a proper URI: secondlife://grid.com/app/login?... |
[9:13] | Harleen Gretzky thought Tess was looking into adding -loginuri | |
[9:13] | Dr Scofield: | saijanai: i posted the chat log to the wiki |
[9:13] | Saijanai Kuhn: | great |
[9:13] | Zero Linden: | ah- is the concern over the integration of the correct URI syntax (secondlife:///) with the previous, tehcnically non-compliant (second://RegionFoo) |
[9:13] | Dr Scofield: | and the summary to sldev |
[9:13] | Zero Linden: | ? |
[9:13] | Dr Scofield: | yes! |
[9:13] | Neas Bade: | right, and more importantly getting to a point where |
[9:13] | Dr Scofield: | secondlife:/// it turns out addresses the client |
[9:14] | Neas Bade: | secondlife://osgrid.org/region/Wright%20Plaza/10/10/20 is a legitimate URI |
[9:14] | Saijanai Kuhn: | https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/AWGroupies-2008-01-08 |
[9:14] | Zero Linden: | okay - so, since I'm the RFC-weenie inside LL that insisted on that third slash |
[9:14] | Zero Linden: | let me explain |
[9:14] | Dr Scofield: | whereas secondlife://region/X/Y/Z addresses a location in the grid |
[9:14] | Dr Scofield: | and neas example makes a lot of sense |
[9:14] | Zero Linden: | So - we've GOT an exsiting, ill-formed, non-compliant scheme |
[9:14] | Neas Bade: | because SLURLs should really identify a unique network resource |
[9:15] | Zero Linden: | secondlife://Grasmere/123/345 |
[9:15] | Zero Linden: | is Legal |
[9:15] | Zero Linden: | really |
[9:15] | Dr Scofield: | agree on that one, zero :-) |
[9:15] | Zero Linden: | because the URI syntax requires that if your scheme starts with two slashes |
[9:16] | Neas Bade: | yep, it's not that it isn't legal |
[9:16] | Zero Linden: | THEN, the first segment MUST have the syntax for domain names |
[9:16] | Neas Bade: | it's that by not including explicit hostname, there is an implied grid name |
[9:16] | Neas Bade: | and to make all things equal, we should be explicit about the gridname |
[9:16] | Zero Linden: | Well, the old syntax is what it is.... I can't fix that |
[9:17] | Neas Bade: | right, but we could adjust over time |
[9:17] | Neas Bade: | my last post to sldev gave a set of steps that could get you there |
[9:17] | Zero Linden: | but let's make one thing clear, even if you put a host name there - nothing in the URI spec says that that has to be the host name you contact |
[9:17] | Chosen Raymaker: | or introduce a new scheme name |
[9:17] | Zha Ewry: | There is a fair question, about whether we can fix it now, so we don't have to revisit it in six to twelev months |
[9:17] | Neas Bade: | correct |
[9:17] | Zero Linden: | so - |
[9:17] | Saijanai Kuhn: | or rather, so we might not have to revisit it... |
[9:18] | Zero Linden: | secondlife: scheme is NOT intended to be the URLs of locations in world |
[9:18] | Zero Linden: | really- that would be a poor choice |
[9:18] | Neas Bade: | but, by making secondlife:// URIs act more like http:// URIs, it makes life a lot easier |
[9:18] | Saijanai Kuhn: | the best laid plans of avatars... |
[9:18] | Zero Linden: | I say, just use an HTTP name |
[9:18] | Zero Linden: | http://slurl.com/secondlife/Grasmere/178/113/27 |
[9:18] | Zero Linden: | that is the URL of this location |
[9:19] | Neas Bade: | ok, so where can I type that into the location browser in my SL client? |
[9:20] | Zero Linden: | secondlife: is a scheme for invoking one's client to do something |
[9:20] | Neas Bade: | I understand that is the way it is today |
[9:20] | Zero Linden: | Neas - you can't 'cause our viewer has no address bar! |
[9:20] | Neas Bade: | but it seems like it wouldn't be much to work to make secondlife:// uris actually be network resources in a sensible way |
[9:21] | Saijanai Kuhn: | well, the map *could* be, but you'd need to have it parse and resolve slurls |
[9:21] | Zero Linden: | It seems like an indirection that is generally uneeded |
[9:21] | Zero Linden: | for example |
[9:21] | Neas Bade: | and I really think that until that is make explicitly so, there is going to continue to be assumptions made in the client that don't work for alternate grids |
[9:21] | Zero Linden: | let's take secondlife:///app/profile/Zero/Linden |
[9:21] | Neas Bade: | it's social engineering as much as anything else |
[9:22] | Zero Linden: | should that be *the* name of the resource that is my profile? |
[9:22] | Zero Linden: | seems far less useful than |
[9:22] | Neas Bade: | but your profile is only valid in the context of a specific grid |
[9:22] | Zero Linden: | http://grid.secondlife.com/agents/Zero/Linden/profile |
[9:23] | Zero Linden: | Ah - I see what you are driving out |
[9:23] | Neas Bade: | ok, then get rid of secondilfe:// entirely, and just use http |
[9:23] | Zero Linden: | driving at |
[9:23] | Saijanai Kuhn: | actually with universal avatars... |
[9:23] | Zha Ewry listens closely | |
[9:23] | Zero Linden: | right - only the only way to get interaction between a web browser and a more complex UI (say, a viewer app) is this goofy scheme HACK |
[9:23] | Neas Bade: | right |
[9:23] | Harleen Gretzky: | Your profile is actually: secondlife:///app/agent/2e3e325b-2887-4a3c-aceb-c94227019b22/about already |
[9:24] | Neas Bade: | and my point has been that instead of just doing the minimum for the hack using secondlife://, make the secondlife URIs explicitly contain grid infomation in them |
[9:24] | Neas Bade: | which then makes the ideas of navigation between grids, and refernce points of the secondlife urls very explicity |
[9:25] | Saijanai Kuhn: | /grid-"Second Life" |
[9:25] | Saijanai Kuhn: | =* |
[9:25] | Zha Ewry: | And.. sets us up nicely for the future |
[9:25] | Neas Bade: | and starts to form a model where the secondlife scheme looks a lot more like www |
[9:25] | Neas Bade: | zha: exactly |
[9:25] | Neas Bade: | stop thinking of secondilfe:// as a hack to trick the client to do something, and think of those URIs as actual network resources that the client is asked to load |
[9:26] | Zero Linden: | Neas - that then brings up the issue of "what identifies a grid"? |
[9:26] | Zero Linden: | which domani name? |
[9:26] | Zero Linden: | do we need to make the Agent Domain / Region Domain distinction now? |
[9:26] | Saijanai Kuhn would like to see a UUID for each grid but | |
[9:26] | Neas Bade: | hostname:port of the login server would be a reasonable starting place |
[9:26] | Neas Bade: | as that is going to be the entry point |
[9:26] | Zha Ewry: | As its an overlay construct over the www name space |
[9:27] | Zero Linden: | hmmm... but then, here's the problem with that |
[9:27] | Zero Linden: | if you use the login server and port |
[9:27] | Zha Ewry would hate to see it nind all thwe way to a single domain name | |
[9:27] | Tao Takashi: | btw, those profiles should contain microformats :) |
[9:27] | Zero Linden: | BUT, that isn't the actual place the viwer goes to get the info it needs |
[9:27] | Zero Linden: | THEN there is some form of transformation that the viewer needs to do to get to the right place |
[9:27] | Neas Bade: | right, but google.com is 100k machines |
[9:27] | Tao Takashi: | but then again there is not too much to markup with microformats anyway |
[9:28] | Neas Bade: | but you can have a single name that gets you to 100k machines, and the http spreader figures out where you really go |
[9:28] | Zero Linden: | well, that isn't quite the same, Neas |
[9:28] | Kri Ayakashi: | btw, will SL follow login ideas like OpenID? meaning having an account on one grid lets you in to other grids ? |
[9:28] | Chosen Raymaker: | Zero: An unrelated question before you close? Can you tell us why groups are limited at 25? If it is to limit server load, what traffic exactly is significant in this connection? |
[9:28] | Zha Ewry: | In the one case, it's a http endpoint, in this case, we're nming an ovrlay |
[9:28] | Zero Linden: | when you go to google.com - routers , level 2 swithces, and load balancers pick one of those 100k machines |
[9:29] | Zero Linden: | but they are all equiavelent |
[9:29] | Zero Linden: | for whatever you ask of google.com |
[9:29] | Nika Talaj: | ? is a grid a service or a server |
[9:29] | Neas Bade: | mail.google.com is pretty stateful |
[9:29] | Neas Bade: | and that is a lot of machines |
[9:29] | Zero Linden: | right - and they have load balancers that deal with that |
[9:29] | Zero Linden: | BUT this is different |
[9:29] | Zero Linden: | well |
[9:29] | Zero Linden: | may be not |
[9:29] | Neas Bade: | right, but those aren't l2 balancers |
[9:30] | Zero Linden: | but what I'm saying is that if you see a resource identified by //google.com/ - you ask your question by connecting to google.com |
[9:30] | Neas Bade: | to get mail.google.com working right, you are balancing much higher up, giving all the stateful ajax |
[9:30] | Neas Bade: | docs.google.com is even more so the case, where your live editting is updated every 10 seconds |
[9:30] | Zero Linden: | if you see something like secondlife://login.agni.lindenlab.com:443/app/profile/2e3e325b-2887-4a3c-aceb-c94227019b22/about |
[9:30] | Zha Ewry: | def not l2 balances, no |
[9:31] | Neas Bade: | anyway, the point is that having a name for a grid being a hostname shouldn't be a big deal |
[9:31] | Zero Linden: | you need to connect to login.agni.lindenlab.com:443 to get the asnwer |
[9:31] | Zero Linden: | and - it turns out, that that machine can't answer that question |
[9:31] | Neas Bade: | then that URI shouldn't be returned |
[9:31] | Neas Bade: | or if it is, we have 30x codes to bounce to the right location |
[9:31] | Zero Linden: | Right now, the secondlife:/// scheme is intended to control the viewer, by asking it to do things with respect to the grid it is connected to now |
[9:31] | Kri Ayakashi: | well it could use some rewrite rules based on the URL provided to bounce the request to other machine |
[9:31] | Zero Linden: | The only excpetion is secondlife:///app/login |
[9:31] | Neas Bade: | right, I do undestand what is is today |
[9:31] | Zero Linden: | which needs to say which grid |
[9:32] | Zero Linden: | I think you are absolutely right about how such things need to work in the future |
[9:32] | Neas Bade: | but I really really really think that keeping with that design point is so fundamentally limitting that it has to change in the future |
[9:32] | Neas Bade: | and the sooner the better |
[9:32] | Neas Bade: | as it is a very clear early interop issue between multiple grids |
[9:32] | Zero Linden: | I just think we should assume that there will be a new scheme than secondlife:/// |
[9:33] | Zero Linden: | well all |
[9:33] | Zero Linden: | I'm now late for my next meeting |
[9:33] | Zero Linden: | good stuff here |
[9:33] | Kri Ayakashi: | well the old scheme could implictly assume linden grid as the default for some time to give everyone some space to adapt to new scheme |
[9:33] | Neas Bade: | thanks zero, great talking with you :) |
[9:33] | Zero Linden: | I guess I'll put this up in the wiki |
[9:33] | Rex Cronon: | bye zero |
[9:33] | Zero Linden: | thanks for coming |
[9:33] | Zero Linden: | great discussions - all of 'em! |
[9:33] | Tao Takashi: | thanks for hosting! |
[9:33] | Zero Linden: | bye |
[9:33] | Tao Takashi: | cya! |
[9:33] | Zha Ewry: | Thanks zeor, lets docu ment that its choing to change, then |
[9:33] | Kri Ayakashi: | bye Zero |