LSL Constants vs Globals

From Second Life Wiki
Revision as of 08:19, 8 July 2008 by Strife Onizuka (talk | contribs) (New page: There are some advantages in using global variables over the string and key constants, it's faster and uses less bytecode when it is longer then 3 characters and it used more then twice bu...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

There are some advantages in using global variables over the string and key constants, it's faster and uses less bytecode when it is longer then 3 characters and it used more then twice but it uses more bytecode when it is shorter then 3 characters or it used once. This is easily demonstrated by running the scripts in Figure 2.

Figure 1: Pros and Cons of using globals
Constant Global
  • Faster
  • Uses less bytecode when it is longer then 3 characters and it used more then twice.
  • Uses more bytecode when it is shorter then 3 characters or it used once.
Figure 2: Bytecode Cost
Constant Global

<lsl>

dead(){

   key a = NULL_KEY;
   key b = NULL_KEY;
   key c = NULL_KEY;
   key d = NULL_KEY;

}

default {

   state_entry() {
       llOwnerSay(llGetFreeMemory());
   }

}</lsl>

<lsl>key null_key = NULL_KEY;

dead(){

   key a = null_key;
   key b = null_key;
   key c = null_key;
   key d = null_key;

}

default {

   state_entry() {
       llOwnerSay(llGetFreeMemory());
   }

}</lsl>