Difference between revisions of "Project talk:Languages"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added note about ISO_639-3 cat-speaking template)
m (→‎Supported Languages: yes more wiki languages than viewer languages can make sense)
Line 26: Line 26:


-- [[User:Alissa Sabre|Alissa Sabre]] 18:57, 10 September 2007 (PDT)
-- [[User:Alissa Sabre|Alissa Sabre]] 18:57, 10 September 2007 (PDT)
:I agree having more wiki languages than viewer languages can make sense. I think we say "Ilalian" here to mean "Italian". I, for one, have used the English viewer to chat in Italian. -- [[User:Ppaatt Lynagh|Ppaatt Lynagh]] 08:08, 4 November 2007 (PST)


:[[Template:ISO_639-3/cat-speaking]] contains all ISO 639-3 languages in their english spelling.
:[[Template:ISO_639-3/cat-speaking]] contains all ISO 639-3 languages in their english spelling.
:[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 18:02, 12 October 2007 (PDT)
:-- [[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 18:02, 12 October 2007 (PDT)

Revision as of 09:08, 4 November 2007

Some notes

I prefer use of ISO 639-1 alpha-2 codes for language identification, because it covers most of the major languages and it is the common practice of IT industry today. I believe 639-2 alpha-3 is overkilling for the projects like SL wiki, but it can co-exist with alpha-2 codes, and I added some wording on the possibility of their uses in a future. Use of ISO 639-3 doesn't make sense. (Who wants to have pages in such rare languages?)

I just taken the page title convention from MediaWiki web site. It is primarily consistent with the existing practice on this SL wiki.

I know that Project talk:I18n#Translated versions of an existing article says some different convention on the page translation, but I ignored it, primarily because I don't think ISO 639-3 is a good choice (see above for this point), and entire page and its associated project page doesn't look like a page to cover I18N (internationalziation) issues on SL wiki project. The page is for a group activity called "I18N project". (I believe the author of the page didn't know the purpose of MediaWiki's project name space...)

I know that a set of pages Voice Mentors: Getting Started with Voice and its (incomplete) translations uses similar but different convention. I believe the differences are small, and we can migrate in a future.

-- Alissa Sabre 23:58, 7 September 2007 (PDT)

Supported Languages

I noticed that the list of supported languages shown here and that for viewer UI (shown on How to Localize Your World).

Languages only supported as a wiki page:

  • Ilalian
  • Dutch

Languages only supported as a viewer UI:

  • Korean

I also noticed that the list of supported languages in Template:Languages-spoken is very huge; it looks like covering all ISO 639-1 languages. (Although I've not verified...)

I personally don't care the disagreement in this case. Opinions?

-- Alissa Sabre 18:57, 10 September 2007 (PDT)

I agree having more wiki languages than viewer languages can make sense. I think we say "Ilalian" here to mean "Italian". I, for one, have used the English viewer to chat in Italian. -- Ppaatt Lynagh 08:08, 4 November 2007 (PST)
Template:ISO_639-3/cat-speaking contains all ISO 639-3 languages in their english spelling.
-- SignpostMarv Martin 18:02, 12 October 2007 (PDT)