Difference between revisions of "Talk:Grid Identifiers Spec"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cenji Neutra (talk | contribs) m |
Cenji Neutra (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Based on feedback received thus far from various parties, including comments on sldev, for the 2nd draft we're considering switching the notation to a URN scheme. We may even expand the scope of the proposal to include lookup of a resolver service. | Based on feedback received thus far from various parties, including comments on sldev, for the 2nd draft we're considering switching the notation to a URN scheme. We may even expand the scope of the proposal to include lookup of a resolver service. | ||
Although beyond the scope of the spec, more | Although beyond the scope of the spec, more thought may be given to how a resolver service might be implemented. One possibility would be the use of DNS with NAPTR and SRV records, or something similar to [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3401 DDDS]. See [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2915 RFC2915] - [[User:Cenji Neutra|Cenji Neutra]] 19:29, 10 June 2008 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:11, 10 June 2008
Open Grid Identifier Notation discussion page.
(please end each comment with ~~~~, which will be substituted with your name and the date-time)
Based on feedback received thus far from various parties, including comments on sldev, for the 2nd draft we're considering switching the notation to a URN scheme. We may even expand the scope of the proposal to include lookup of a resolver service.
Although beyond the scope of the spec, more thought may be given to how a resolver service might be implemented. One possibility would be the use of DNS with NAPTR and SRV records, or something similar to DDDS. See RFC2915 - Cenji Neutra 19:29, 10 June 2008 (PDT)