Difference between revisions of "Talk:Plugin architecture"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(clarification.)
(→‎semantics: response)
Line 9: Line 9:
::[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 13:35, 14 February 2007 (PST)
::[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 13:35, 14 February 2007 (PST)
:::Yes, it is LL's policy.  The bug in Jira to use multiple namespaces was shot down and closed WONTFIX.  Fragmenting the namespace has negative effects on searching and no real benefit.  Namespaces should be used for pages that are fundamentally different in some way, not as a way to partition articles.  Please don't use the Project: namespace for articles.  Just create the article and then tag it with categories it fits in.  People can bring up the category page to look through pages in that category.  [[User:Gigs Taggart|Gigs Taggart]] 13:45, 14 February 2007 (PST)
:::Yes, it is LL's policy.  The bug in Jira to use multiple namespaces was shot down and closed WONTFIX.  Fragmenting the namespace has negative effects on searching and no real benefit.  Namespaces should be used for pages that are fundamentally different in some way, not as a way to partition articles.  Please don't use the Project: namespace for articles.  Just create the article and then tag it with categories it fits in.  People can bring up the category page to look through pages in that category.  [[User:Gigs Taggart|Gigs Taggart]] 13:45, 14 February 2007 (PST)
::::{{JIRA|WEB-22}} was Rob shooting down Strife's request to have "LSL" added as a custom namespace, '''not''' Rob shooting down any and all uses of built-in namespaces.
::::If this article is intended to be a hub for the standardisation and development of plugins & plugin architecture, then it should be moved to [[Project:Plugin architecture]], as it would be a "project" within the SL Wiki, as opposed to an article which describes the plugin architecture once it's defined.
::::[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 14:35, 14 February 2007 (PST)

Revision as of 15:35, 14 February 2007

Glad to see a conversation blooming here. Any chance we can see a little consolidation of these pages, though? Looks like we're sprawling out quite a bit. -- Rob Linden 20:01, 12 February 2007 (PST)

semantics

This should probably be moved to Project:Plugin architecture
SignpostMarv Martin 13:17, 14 February 2007 (PST)

No, Project: is used for official metainformation about the open source project from linden lab. Things like policy statements and such. This namespace is fine. Gigs Taggart 13:30, 14 February 2007 (PST)
Is that LL policy, or a practice borrowed from the Wikipedia ?
SignpostMarv Martin 13:35, 14 February 2007 (PST)
Yes, it is LL's policy. The bug in Jira to use multiple namespaces was shot down and closed WONTFIX. Fragmenting the namespace has negative effects on searching and no real benefit. Namespaces should be used for pages that are fundamentally different in some way, not as a way to partition articles. Please don't use the Project: namespace for articles. Just create the article and then tag it with categories it fits in. People can bring up the category page to look through pages in that category. Gigs Taggart 13:45, 14 February 2007 (PST)
WEB-22 was Rob shooting down Strife's request to have "LSL" added as a custom namespace, not Rob shooting down any and all uses of built-in namespaces.
If this article is intended to be a hub for the standardisation and development of plugins & plugin architecture, then it should be moved to Project:Plugin architecture, as it would be a "project" within the SL Wiki, as opposed to an article which describes the plugin architecture once it's defined.
SignpostMarv Martin 14:35, 14 February 2007 (PST)