Difference between revisions of "Category talk:LSL Library"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→re: Rules for posting: tweaked response) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::# All the LSL Library scripts should be cross linked to other relevant sub categories. | ::# All the LSL Library scripts should be cross linked to other relevant sub categories. | ||
::[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 07:00, 13 February 2007 (PST) | ::[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 07:00, 13 February 2007 (PST) | ||
:::I am loath to put library scripts into categories with built in functions. Since we are considering a pseudo-namespace specific to LSL (ie, LSL:) why not LSL Library: be considered? I seem to be less loath to having it included library scripts in categories with functions as a pseudo-namespace with a ":" then a " ". ":" provides a better separator. [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 08:30, 13 February 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 09:30, 13 February 2007
re: Rules for posting
Enforcing the "LSL Library" prefix "in order to keep the namespace clean" is kinda contradictory.
Keeping the articles in the creator's own user-space makes a whole lot more sense- see Resident's own pages in Resident's own user-spaces
SignpostMarv Martin 14:48, 12 February 2007 (PST)
- Doing that will remove those items from the search. I do not see that as an advantage. Thraxis Epsilon 15:45, 12 February 2007 (PST)
- No it wouldn't.
- Wiki search for llXorBase64StringsCorrect()
- Google Co-op search for llXorBase64StringsCorrect()
- Also:
- All the LSL Library scripts would be listed here.
- All the LSL Library scripts should be cross linked to other relevant sub categories.
- SignpostMarv Martin 07:00, 13 February 2007 (PST)
- I am loath to put library scripts into categories with built in functions. Since we are considering a pseudo-namespace specific to LSL (ie, LSL:) why not LSL Library: be considered? I seem to be less loath to having it included library scripts in categories with functions as a pseudo-namespace with a ":" then a " ". ":" provides a better separator. Strife Onizuka 08:30, 13 February 2007 (PST)