Difference between revisions of "Template talk:LSL Function"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Comments wanted) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Comments == | == Comments == | ||
What do people think of the "Function: " prefix? [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 17:50, 10 February 2007 (PST) | What do people think of the "Function: " prefix on the first box title? [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 17:50, 10 February 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 18:50, 10 February 2007
Might help to give a short description of each of the parameters. Talarus Luan 12:56, 28 January 2007 (PST)
Done... sort of. Added a feature request mode (so requests don't get lumped in with the normal categories). Strife Onizuka 06:12, 6 February 2007 (PST)
Defined value template
Do you know if anyone has started something for constants for the functions. Would this be a template, or table or something?
- I've just been going through making constant tables as I go through the function. If you want to skip any function that works with constants thats ok, I'll get around to them sooner or later.Strife Onizuka 21:50, 9 February 2007 (PST)
TODO
- Make 'func_desc' & 'return_text' warning sensitive to 'return_type' so a more detailed warning can be issued.
Comments
What do people think of the "Function: " prefix on the first box title? Strife Onizuka 17:50, 10 February 2007 (PST)