Difference between revisions of "Category talk:LSL Flow Control"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→LSL Prefix: response) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Turns the question around: Why doesn't this category need the LSL prefix. | :Turns the question around: Why doesn't this category need the LSL prefix. | ||
:It comes down to aesthetics. There aren't any technical reasons. When looking at the category list it makes it easy to find LSL categories. Searching for LSL categories is difficult. It makes enumeration easier. [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 10:01, 23 February 2007 (PST) | :It comes down to aesthetics. There aren't any technical reasons. When looking at the category list it makes it easy to find LSL categories. Searching for LSL categories is difficult. It makes enumeration easier. [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 10:01, 23 February 2007 (PST) | ||
::# LSL-specific categories should be listed under [[:Category:LSL]] | |||
::# Enumeration ? | |||
::# If LSL-specific categories were listed under [[:Category:LSL]], and you were looking for LSL stuff you'd go there first- would the LSL prefix need to be there ? | |||
::[[User:SignpostMarv Martin|SignpostMarv Martin]] 14:30, 23 February 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 15:30, 23 February 2007
LSL Prefix
Question: Does this category need the LSL prefix. SignpostMarv Martin 09:47, 23 February 2007 (PST)
- Turns the question around: Why doesn't this category need the LSL prefix.
- It comes down to aesthetics. There aren't any technical reasons. When looking at the category list it makes it easy to find LSL categories. Searching for LSL categories is difficult. It makes enumeration easier. Strife Onizuka 10:01, 23 February 2007 (PST)
- LSL-specific categories should be listed under Category:LSL
- Enumeration ?
- If LSL-specific categories were listed under Category:LSL, and you were looking for LSL stuff you'd go there first- would the LSL prefix need to be there ?
- SignpostMarv Martin 14:30, 23 February 2007 (PST)