Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlSetLinkPrimitiveParamsFast"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fred Gandt (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
When these fast functions are introduced we should just convert? Or is there a catch? I mean, will there be times when we shouldn't use the fast version? -- '''[[User:Fred_Gandt|Fred Gandt]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Fred_Gandt|talk]]|[[User:Fred_Gandt/Scripts|scripts]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fred_Gandt|contribs]])</small></sup> 16:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC) | When these fast functions are introduced we should just convert? Or is there a catch? I mean, will there be times when we shouldn't use the fast version? -- '''[[User:Fred_Gandt|Fred Gandt]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Fred_Gandt|talk]]|[[User:Fred_Gandt/Scripts|scripts]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fred_Gandt|contribs]])</small></sup> 16:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Hi, there is no catch! The old functions are not changed so old scripts using them do not break if they depend on the delays. --[[User:Cerise Sorbet|Cerise Sorbet]] 18:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC) | :Hi, there is no catch! The old functions are not changed so old scripts using them do not break if they depend on the delays. --[[User:Cerise Sorbet|Cerise Sorbet]] 18:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Sometimes too good to be true really is. *remains sceptical* But thanks for the positive response Cerise. I look forward to seeing the objects this will allow; especially in tandem with [[llGetLinkPrimitiveParams]] OMG!!! llGetLinkPrim... LLGetLINK!!! >>> LINK <<< *faints* ;-) -- '''[[User:Fred_Gandt|Fred Gandt]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Fred_Gandt|talk]]|[[User:Fred_Gandt/Scripts|scripts]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fred_Gandt|contribs]])</small></sup> 22:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:57, 9 March 2010
What's the catch?
When these fast functions are introduced we should just convert? Or is there a catch? I mean, will there be times when we shouldn't use the fast version? -- Fred Gandt (talk|scripts|contribs) 16:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, there is no catch! The old functions are not changed so old scripts using them do not break if they depend on the delays. --Cerise Sorbet 18:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sometimes too good to be true really is. *remains sceptical* But thanks for the positive response Cerise. I look forward to seeing the objects this will allow; especially in tandem with llGetLinkPrimitiveParams OMG!!! llGetLinkPrim... LLGetLINK!!! >>> LINK <<< *faints* ;-) -- Fred Gandt (talk|scripts|contribs) 22:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)