Difference between revisions of "User talk:Finrod Meriman/AWG Feedback"

From Second Life Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: * I indentified with your comments here strongly, because I've been trying to analyse the basis for claimed scalability in the AWG architectural diagrams and did not find what I was lookin...)
 
m (Talk:Mic's Feedback moved to User talk:Finrod Meriman/AWG Feedback: Moving into user space)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== 2) Make our architectural "views" explicit. ==
* I indentified with your comments here strongly, because I've been trying to analyse the basis for claimed scalability in the AWG architectural diagrams and did not find what I was looking for.  Taking the perspective of your report and with a nod to IEEE-1471, I find that the scalability viewpoint has not been described, just as you found that the functional viewpoint was hard to discern.
* I indentified with your comments here strongly, because I've been trying to analyse the basis for claimed scalability in the AWG architectural diagrams and did not find what I was looking for.  Taking the perspective of your report and with a nod to IEEE-1471, I find that the scalability viewpoint has not been described, just as you found that the functional viewpoint was hard to discern.


* I've written a comment about it in the [[Talk:Multiple_Domains#How to link domains]] page. ---[[User:Morgaine Dinova|Morgaine Dinova]] 12:07, 26 September 2007 (PDT)
* I've written a comment about it in the [[Talk:Multiple_Domains#How to link domains]] page. ---[[User:Morgaine Dinova|Morgaine Dinova]] 12:07, 26 September 2007 (PDT)
Mic - good summary. I'd also like to understand better how the data moves around, especially geometry. Collada was a good point and some standard (any standard!) would be good.  For companies, they will want two things:  Security and a way to control and import content --[[User:Burhop Piccard|Burhop Piccard]] 17:43, 3 October 2007 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 15:54, 6 November 2007

2) Make our architectural "views" explicit.

  • I indentified with your comments here strongly, because I've been trying to analyse the basis for claimed scalability in the AWG architectural diagrams and did not find what I was looking for. Taking the perspective of your report and with a nod to IEEE-1471, I find that the scalability viewpoint has not been described, just as you found that the functional viewpoint was hard to discern.

Mic - good summary. I'd also like to understand better how the data moves around, especially geometry. Collada was a good point and some standard (any standard!) would be good. For companies, they will want two things: Security and a way to control and import content --Burhop Piccard 17:43, 3 October 2007 (PDT)