Difference between revisions of "TPVD/Developers Group Agenda"
< TPVD
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Current and Open Items: | Current and Open Items: | ||
# Direct Delivery - new delivery mechanism; Brooke Linden, Marketplace | |||
Previous agenda: | Previous agenda: | ||
# Any updates on getting detailed stats? --[[User:Kadah Coba|Kadah Coba]] | # Any updates on getting detailed stats? --[[User:Kadah Coba|Kadah Coba]] | ||
# Looking for documentation of crashlog / minidump processing, such as example server code, build tool integration, documentation of process, etc. --([[User:Arrehn Oberlander|Arrehn Oberlander]]) | # Looking for documentation of crashlog / minidump processing, such as example server code, build tool integration, documentation of process, etc. --([[User:Arrehn Oberlander|Arrehn Oberlander]]) | ||
# Digital signing: Viewer2 only has the installer signed for | # Digital signing: Viewer2 only has the installer signed for windows (at least on the release that I checked, 2.6.1.225680), does LL get many reports of issues with anti virus ware that might be caused by this? We're signing both the installer and the viewer executable. Would there be a reason for me not to sign the slplugin and slvoice as well? --[[User:Kadah Coba|Kadah Coba]] ] | ||
Revision as of 20:13, 19 May 2011
Current and Open Items:
- Direct Delivery - new delivery mechanism; Brooke Linden, Marketplace
Previous agenda:
- Any updates on getting detailed stats? --Kadah Coba
- Looking for documentation of crashlog / minidump processing, such as example server code, build tool integration, documentation of process, etc. --(Arrehn Oberlander)
- Digital signing: Viewer2 only has the installer signed for windows (at least on the release that I checked, 2.6.1.225680), does LL get many reports of issues with anti virus ware that might be caused by this? We're signing both the installer and the viewer executable. Would there be a reason for me not to sign the slplugin and slvoice as well? --Kadah Coba ]