Difference between revisions of "Talk:Adult content keywords"
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:<strike>P.S.: Remove [[Search keywords]] too plz, since it's a dead redirect now. [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 16:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)</strike> | :<strike>P.S.: Remove [[Search keywords]] too plz, since it's a dead redirect now. [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 16:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)</strike> | ||
I for one think they were right in deleting the list of keywords that you can't use in SL, in a pg sim, or pg parcel description. Like they said there were some incorrect keywords in there. Instead of going through them all and fixing the list it was just better to delete it altogether. If Residents don't want to get warned, temp-banned, perma-banned or worse(?) they should take it upon themselves to know the keywords you're not allowed to use in PG sims. But, that's up to them to figure out. If they posted the list of keywords that you can't use without getting into trouble for using them, then people would find someway to game the search system by not using them. I'm sure that in time they'll post an official list of all the adult keywords you're not allowed to use. I'd say until then if you don't want to get in trouble for using the wrong keywords, don't use any keywords. Better safe than sorry! | |||
[[User:Tormented Twilight|Tormented Twilight]] 01:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Reinstated == | == Reinstated == | ||
| Line 20: | Line 22: | ||
Do you think we'll get away with putting a link to an offsite list of words? Or would that be considered taking the piss? - Elanthius Flagstaff | Do you think we'll get away with putting a link to an offsite list of words? Or would that be considered taking the piss? - Elanthius Flagstaff | ||
:I'd consider this | :I'd consider this being the wrong way to deal with the issue. Although I don't agree with the reasoning behind the deletion, we should accept LL's authority of this wiki and respect their will, not to have this list available in this spot. Though I'd vote for bringing the issue up at [[User:Blondin Linden|Blondin]]'s office hour, rather than taking the step to link the list and risk a second deletion. [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 10:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
:This is their wiki, so I accept their decision not to publish the list of filtered words. We have our own wiki at www.slapt.me, so people can go look there if they want. [[User:DanielRavenNest Noe|DanielRavenNest Noe]] 15:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:15, 29 May 2009
Thanks to Milla for adding a bunch more to the list. Could you note here what list of words you tested? It would make it easier to search if we know what's already been tried.—The preceding unsigned comment was added on 10:48, 27 April 2009 by DanielRavenNest Noe
Deletion
It was wrong to delete this list. It didn't violate the Editing Guidelines (only point I could imagine would be the PG paragraph tho I'd consider a list of keywords still PG as documantation rather than obscenity). Furthermore, it will prevent the contributors to contribute more content to any article because of the fear of irrecoverable removal. It only causes drama.
The reason given at thread 2407818 post 5987 isn't really a reason to remove this. False information can be fixed. If we'd decide to remove every article that contains partitially false or incomplete information, we wouldn't have much of a wiki anymore.
-- 
Lynch (talk|contribs) 16:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
P.S.: Remove Search keywords too plz, since it's a dead redirect now.
Lynch (talk|contribs) 16:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
I for one think they were right in deleting the list of keywords that you can't use in SL, in a pg sim, or pg parcel description. Like they said there were some incorrect keywords in there. Instead of going through them all and fixing the list it was just better to delete it altogether. If Residents don't want to get warned, temp-banned, perma-banned or worse(?) they should take it upon themselves to know the keywords you're not allowed to use in PG sims. But, that's up to them to figure out. If they posted the list of keywords that you can't use without getting into trouble for using them, then people would find someway to game the search system by not using them. I'm sure that in time they'll post an official list of all the adult keywords you're not allowed to use. I'd say until then if you don't want to get in trouble for using the wrong keywords, don't use any keywords. Better safe than sorry!
Tormented Twilight 01:49, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Reinstated
Reinstated page without actual list. Also noted that search.secondlife.com is filtered too.—The preceding unsigned comment was added on 19:05, 28 April 2009 by DanielRavenNest Noe
Do you think we'll get away with putting a link to an offsite list of words? Or would that be considered taking the piss? - Elanthius Flagstaff
- I'd consider this being the wrong way to deal with the issue. Although I don't agree with the reasoning behind the deletion, we should accept LL's authority of this wiki and respect their will, not to have this list available in this spot. Though I'd vote for bringing the issue up at Blondin's office hour, rather than taking the step to link the list and risk a second deletion. Lynch (talk|contribs) 10:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- This is their wiki, so I accept their decision not to publish the list of filtered words. We have our own wiki at www.slapt.me, so people can go look there if they want. DanielRavenNest Noe 15:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)