Difference between revisions of "User talk:Gnome Inkpen"
Gnome Inkpen (talk | contribs) m |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:::Very welcome! :D And thanks for pointing it out that there was a source of confusion. Made the article better in the end and therefor is much appreciated! | :::Very welcome! :D And thanks for pointing it out that there was a source of confusion. Made the article better in the end and therefor is much appreciated! | ||
:::--[[File:Zai_signature.png|45px|link=User:Zai Lynch]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 07:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | :::--[[File:Zai_signature.png|45px|link=User:Zai Lynch]] <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 07:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::Indeed! To quote a Torley Linden tutorial, ".. and we are all BETTA' for it!" :D -- [[User:Gnome Inkpen|Gnomeh]] 08:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 00:12, 6 December 2009
Summmer was HERE
Summer Harcourt was here! SQUEEK! Summer Harcourt 06:18, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Not vs. Note
Heyas Gnome! :-)
I noticed your addition to the Login screen article. You replaced "Not" with "Note", though although I'm not native in English, I believe that is wrong (hence why I reverted it twice). I will try to point out why:
It is currently ("as of this writing") not possible to submit pictures for the login screen. As an alternative, the article suggests to make a contribution to the showcase instead. That is what the subsection tries to say. I think that replacing "not" with "note" doesn't carry the same message. In fact, I'd even believe that it wouldn't be a real sentence anymore. I'd expect a colon after "Note" and then an explanation on what I'm supposed to note. Though I might be mistaken. Can you point out more details about your revision so I can understand why it should be in place instead of the current version? Thanks in advance! :D
-- (talk|contribs) 06:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- I tried to clarify it in the article with an additional "no", "however" and "instead". Maybe you can have a look at the current version as well and give feedback to that. :-) -- (talk|contribs) 06:41, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hai Zai! Yah, I see what your saying here. Yours reads much better. I was readin' it all wrong. Thx, for fixing it, and improving it! :D Gnomeh 06:47, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Very welcome! :D And thanks for pointing it out that there was a source of confusion. Made the article better in the end and therefor is much appreciated!
- -- (talk|contribs) 07:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed! To quote a Torley Linden tutorial, ".. and we are all BETTA' for it!" :D -- Gnomeh 08:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- Hai Zai! Yah, I see what your saying here. Yours reads much better. I was readin' it all wrong. Thx, for fixing it, and improving it! :D Gnomeh 06:47, 6 December 2009 (UTC)