Difference between revisions of "Template talk:LSL Function"
(explaining reason for upcoming edit and adding double licensing suggestion) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Get/Set Caveat separation for sub-templates #var:caveats_set, #var:caveats_get, will aid in using the templates for constants. | * Get/Set Caveat separation for sub-templates #var:caveats_set, #var:caveats_get, will aid in using the templates for constants. | ||
* Change History section to a table? | * Change History section to a table? | ||
== LSLwiki.net == | |||
I had a discussion with [[User:Gally Young|Gally]] today and we came to the following conclusion:<br>Since we're not able to copy content from [http://www.lslwiki.net lslwiki.net] and vice versa - because of licensing problems - we might benefit from linking related articles of both wikis. So users can easily switch from one Wiki to the other and find the information most helpful for them. There shouldn't be a rivalry between these two documentation projects. They should benefit from each other. Therefor, we're adding a link to the related LSLwiki.net article to this template. I hope it's ok.<br> | |||
Something else on the same topic: It seems to be(come) quite popular in Wiki culture to double-license the own contributions, in order to make them easier to share. Wikis of interest for us: | |||
* The Second Life Wiki (of course): [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0] | |||
* The [http://www.lslwiki.net LSLwiki.net]: an [http://lslwiki.net/lslwiki/wakka.php?wakka=LSLwikicopyright implicit copyright model] | |||
* The [http://secondlife.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page SecondLife Wikia]: [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GNU Free Documentation License] | |||
Please consider to double-license your contributions to this (or other) Wikis in order to make them easier to share, by writing a statemanet about double licensing on your userpage. You can also use one of [[User:SignpostMarv Martin|Marv]]'s templates: [[Template:Re-license contributions]] as well as [[Template:License]].<br> | |||
This is just a ''suggestion'' of course. Just do it, in case you want to do it.<br> | |||
Greetz, [[Image:Zai_signature.png|45px]] '''[[User:Zai Lynch|Lynch]]''' <sup><small>([[User talk:Zai Lynch|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Zai Lynch|contribs]])</small></sup> 20:14, 9 September 2008 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:14, 9 September 2008
TODO
- Add inline style to parameter table: "margin-bottom:0.5em;" and remove footnote br.
- Wrap Deepnotes sections in divs to isolate them ~_~
- Add preview mode via Template:LSL Generic/preview(?)
- fix func-id for pre-release documentation & LSL_Functions/ID sort.
- Make right side description info floater text a tad smaller.
- Common Mistakes section?
- Disable category inclusion for requests
- Get/Set Caveat separation for sub-templates #var:caveats_set, #var:caveats_get, will aid in using the templates for constants.
- Change History section to a table?
LSLwiki.net
I had a discussion with Gally today and we came to the following conclusion:
Since we're not able to copy content from lslwiki.net and vice versa - because of licensing problems - we might benefit from linking related articles of both wikis. So users can easily switch from one Wiki to the other and find the information most helpful for them. There shouldn't be a rivalry between these two documentation projects. They should benefit from each other. Therefor, we're adding a link to the related LSLwiki.net article to this template. I hope it's ok.
Something else on the same topic: It seems to be(come) quite popular in Wiki culture to double-license the own contributions, in order to make them easier to share. Wikis of interest for us:
- The Second Life Wiki (of course): Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
- The LSLwiki.net: an implicit copyright model
- The SecondLife Wikia: GNU Free Documentation License
Please consider to double-license your contributions to this (or other) Wikis in order to make them easier to share, by writing a statemanet about double licensing on your userpage. You can also use one of Marv's templates: Template:Re-license contributions as well as Template:License.
This is just a suggestion of course. Just do it, in case you want to do it.
Greetz, 
Lynch (talk|contribs) 20:14, 9 September 2008 (PDT)