Template talk:LSL conformance test

Template magic needed

Hi Strife: great work on the wiki so far. When you get a chance, could you take a look at Template:LSL conformance test and Template:LSL conformance script, which were created for adding our conformance suite? See LSL llGetUnixTime test for an example. I'm mainly looking for help making sure that the interface is sensible (i.e. the template parameter list makes sense and the general structure makes sense). The formatting can wait. The idea is to get these stabilized, and that will provide us a mechanism for those of us at LL to consolidate our tests, and for the community to chip in if desired. -- Rob Linden 22:46, 7 February 2007 (PST) (copied from User talk:Strife Onizuka)

Looks good so far. I can't think of any more sections that need to be added. Adding sections is easy, the trouble comes up when you want to reorganize them. Another thought wouldn't it be better if the page was 'FunctionName/test' instead of 'FunctionName test'? I'll work something into the function page template so it links to a test script if it exists (pretty sure this can be done). Also should be a category for the test scripts. Strife Onizuka 01:21, 8 February 2007 (PST)

I must say I really like the box format used on the function & event pages, maybe use it here too? It works well enough with sections. Strife Onizuka 02:02, 8 February 2007 (PST) (moved from User talk:Strife Onizuka)

I updated the template to follow the "look-n-feel" of those templates to match the rest of the function / event templates.
--Thraxis Epsilon 16:11, 8 February 2007 (PST) (moved from User talk:Strife Onizuka)

<.< I came to like the new look. The boxes don't work so well when nested. Looks a bit busy. But then you can't tell the scopes to well with the large spread. Stuck between a rock and a hard place. Unrelated to this, I've done layouts for flow control. At the point in the day when I'm inclined to sit back and let pendulum swing a bit before I play with it anymore. Strife Onizuka 16:17, 8 February 2007 (PST) (moved from User talk:Strife Onizuka)

Fantastic work, Thraxis! Strife, I'll move the page to reflect your suggested naming. -- Rob Linden 21:39, 8 February 2007 (PST)

Feels empty to me...

The introductory text sounded quite promising, but then, the rest of the sections seem to be pretty empty.

Was this concept totally abandoned? 😭

— Gwyneth Llewelyn (talk) 17:04, 5 September 2023 (PDT)