Difference between revisions of "Open Development User Group"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(make https://codereview.secondlife.com/ readable without login?) |
Jonathan Yap (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
# [https://jira.secondlife.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+%22Open+Development%22+AND+assignee+is+EMPTY+AND+status+%3D+%22Awaiting+Review%22++ORDER+BY+createdDate%2C+priority+DESC OPEN Issue Triage] ([[User:Oz Linden|Oz Linden]]) | # [https://jira.secondlife.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+%22Open+Development%22+AND+assignee+is+EMPTY+AND+status+%3D+%22Awaiting+Review%22++ORDER+BY+createdDate%2C+priority+DESC OPEN Issue Triage] ([[User:Oz Linden|Oz Linden]]) | ||
# Only LL employees and residents with a valid contribution agreement on file are meant to have accounts on https://codereview.secondlife.com/. Thus, when contributors who do have an account want to refer someone to a fix there (that might not yet be available in any public repository), they often hear back that the other can't view it. While there might be legal reasons why people without contribution agreements shouldn't contribute (post review requests, reviews or comments) there, could the content at least be made visible to not-logged in users? ([[User:Boroondas Gupte|Boroondas Gupte]]) | # Only LL employees and residents with a valid contribution agreement on file are meant to have accounts on https://codereview.secondlife.com/. Thus, when contributors who do have an account want to refer someone to a fix there (that might not yet be available in any public repository), they often hear back that the other can't view it. While there might be legal reasons why people without contribution agreements shouldn't contribute (post review requests, reviews or comments) there, could the content at least be made visible to not-logged in users? ([[User:Boroondas Gupte|Boroondas Gupte]]) | ||
Revision as of 04:47, 6 June 2011
Open Source Policies, Resources for Open Contributions, and progressing contributions through the Snowstorm process.
Chaired by Oz Linden of the Snowstorm Team.
Agenda
The agenda for the next meeting is:
- OPEN Issue Triage (Oz Linden)
- Only LL employees and residents with a valid contribution agreement on file are meant to have accounts on https://codereview.secondlife.com/. Thus, when contributors who do have an account want to refer someone to a fix there (that might not yet be available in any public repository), they often hear back that the other can't view it. While there might be legal reasons why people without contribution agreements shouldn't contribute (post review requests, reviews or comments) there, could the content at least be made visible to not-logged in users? (Boroondas Gupte)
Archive
Records of past meetings: Open Development User Group/Archive
- See the list of other user groups.