Difference between revisions of "Talk:ListXequY"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Omei Qunhua (talk | contribs) (why?) |
Void Singer (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
@Strife. I'm not clear about why you made those changes to ListXequY. My code was correct. Admittedly lx==ly is neater for comparing list lengths, - BUT it's not lslEditor safe. Were you just trying to make it faster if the lengths differed? Maybe there's a case for optimising for space. [[User:Omei Qunhua|Omei Qunhua]] 10:35, 21 April 2014 (PDT) | @Strife. I'm not clear about why you made those changes to ListXequY. My code was correct. Admittedly lx==ly is neater for comparing list lengths, - BUT it's not lslEditor safe. Were you just trying to make it faster if the lengths differed? Maybe there's a case for optimising for space. [[User:Omei Qunhua|Omei Qunhua]] 10:35, 21 April 2014 (PDT) | ||
:: because LSLEditor isn't official, and a comparison is much cheaper that 2 function calls? personally I think you are both nuts optimizing things in the examples category, but since the author never bothered :shrug:<br/>-- '''[[User:Void_Singer|Void]]''' <sup><small>([[User_talk:Void_Singer|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Void_Singer|contribs]])</small></sup> 11:18, 21 April 2014 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:18, 21 April 2014
@Strife. I'm not clear about why you made those changes to ListXequY. My code was correct. Admittedly lx==ly is neater for comparing list lengths, - BUT it's not lslEditor safe. Were you just trying to make it faster if the lengths differed? Maybe there's a case for optimising for space. Omei Qunhua 10:35, 21 April 2014 (PDT)