Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jocelyn Linden"
Dan Linden (talk | contribs) |
Rob Linden (talk | contribs) (Moved comment erroneously placed on user page) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hmm, you plan on putting the crash reports on a page called [[Crash_reports]]? That's just crazy! Carry on. [[User:Dan Linden|Dan Linden]] 16:10, 11 June 2007 (PDT) | Hmm, you plan on putting the crash reports on a page called [[Crash_reports]]? That's just crazy! Carry on. [[User:Dan Linden|Dan Linden]] 16:10, 11 June 2007 (PDT) | ||
Hi Joycelyn. Actually I'm quite happy with the open source section of the Wiki as it is. I just visited the Open Source section again with a critical eye, but I currently don't see anything that would need attention. I think it's laid out quite well and the critical sections (those that were a bit outdated or unclear, like compile instructions) have been fixed/streamlined by me and others already. You might ask on the sldev mailing list, but I guess stuff that can be done by the community (like the wiki) has usually been done already. [[User:Nicholaz Beresford|Nicholaz]] 05:12, 21 June 2007 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 10:36, 22 June 2007
Hi Jocelyn! By all means, go ahead with the edits you mentioned on my talk page. Dan Linden 11:05, 7 June 2007 (PDT)
Hmm, you plan on putting the crash reports on a page called Crash_reports? That's just crazy! Carry on. Dan Linden 16:10, 11 June 2007 (PDT)
Hi Joycelyn. Actually I'm quite happy with the open source section of the Wiki as it is. I just visited the Open Source section again with a critical eye, but I currently don't see anything that would need attention. I think it's laid out quite well and the critical sections (those that were a bit outdated or unclear, like compile instructions) have been fixed/streamlined by me and others already. You might ask on the sldev mailing list, but I guess stuff that can be done by the community (like the wiki) has usually been done already. Nicholaz 05:12, 21 June 2007 (PDT)