Difference between revisions of "User talk:Revolution Perenti"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk}} | |||
== The Teen Grid == | == The Teen Grid == | ||
| Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
Rev | Rev | ||
:The holodeck code I can't really say if there is anything wrong fundamentally with it; I haven't studied it in depth but nothing jumped out at me. Besides the whitespacing I did I changed very little of it. There are small things but they come down more to style and inexperience with LSL. LSL does not have an optimizing compiler so using llToLower and llToUpper on constants is not optimal. Unless you need the result of a ++ or -- operation you really should use the "++c" form instead of "c++", it's faster. The way people use ++ and --, there are very few situations where the "c++" form should be used. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 18:53, 3 September 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:53, 3 September 2007
The Teen Grid
That Doesn't leave much of a Way for TGers to contact you....
Scripting
The LSL Portal is a technical resource, which means that all script content needs to be well polished. Unpolished scripts degrade the quality of the wiki. When posting scripts, you must make sure that they function; they must be clean and uniform too. Incomplete and dysfunctional scripts should not be posted. Ugly scripts should be beautified. To put it this way, your whitespace habits are atrocious and every script you have posted to the Library had flaws and some didn't even function properly. I don't want to drive you off, I want to encourage you to do better. -- Strife Onizuka 15:37, 3 September 2007 (PDT)
thanks for the advise, i will revist these about to update the holodeck code too so i will revist them all in a day or so :)
Rev
- The holodeck code I can't really say if there is anything wrong fundamentally with it; I haven't studied it in depth but nothing jumped out at me. Besides the whitespacing I did I changed very little of it. There are small things but they come down more to style and inexperience with LSL. LSL does not have an optimizing compiler so using llToLower and llToUpper on constants is not optimal. Unless you need the result of a ++ or -- operation you really should use the "++c" form instead of "c++", it's faster. The way people use ++ and --, there are very few situations where the "c++" form should be used. -- Strife Onizuka 18:53, 3 September 2007 (PDT)