Difference between revisions of "Version control repository"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Woopsie. Links fixed.) |
Rob Linden (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software | ||
See a discussion of this issue in the [https://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sldev/2007-January/thread.html#37 "Version control repository" discussion on SLDev] as well as [[Talk:Version control repository|the talk page for this page]] | |||
[[Category:Future Roundtables]] | [[Category:Future Roundtables]] |
Revision as of 23:03, 9 January 2007
Linden Lab doesn't yet provide live access to a central revision control repository for the viewer source code. However, this is being considered.
Choices to consider
- Subversion - default choice, and the obvious "safe" choice. Pros: familiar to us, used by a lot of people Cons: very centralized model; need to give people access to facilitate effective collaboration
- Mercurial - bleeding edge choice. Pros: Distributed model makes it easier for anyone to distribute patchsets off of the main codebase without needing a central host. Much easier to maintain a private branch. Cons: more complicated model, less familiar, much newer system (I've never used it, just received a recommendation)
- svk - a decentralized revision control system built on top of svn.
- Externally managed repository, via 3rd party site, such as sourceforge.net, Berlios.de, or similar.
Other systems can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_revision_control_software
See a discussion of this issue in the "Version control repository" discussion on SLDev as well as the talk page for this page