Difference between revisions of "Talk:LlRequestAgentData"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Clang Bailey (talk | contribs) (New page: Is this function reporting properly? Specifically, I seem to get more "2"s than I should. My status is on file and use and it returns a 2 for me. Yet, I do see threes returned for some peo...) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this function reporting properly? Specifically, I seem to get more "2"s than I should. My status is on file and use and it returns a 2 for me. Yet, I do see threes returned for some people. In fact, I see 0 (No info), 2 (No Info but Used(Weird)) and 3 (Info and used), but never 1 (Info filed). Were the bits repurposed and the docs not updated? --[[User:Clang Bailey|Clang Bailey]] 16:34, 29 January 2008 (PST) | Is this function reporting properly? Specifically, I seem to get more "2"s than I should. My status is on file and use and it returns a 2 for me. Yet, I do see threes returned for some people. In fact, I see 0 (No info), 2 (No Info but Used(Weird)) and 3 (Info and used), but never 1 (Info filed). Were the bits repurposed and the docs not updated? --[[User:Clang Bailey|Clang Bailey]] 16:34, 29 January 2008 (PST) | ||
:It is possible to remove the payment information from the file after it has been used. -- [[User:Strife Onizuka|Strife Onizuka]] 20:24, 29 January 2008 (PST) |
Revision as of 20:24, 29 January 2008
Is this function reporting properly? Specifically, I seem to get more "2"s than I should. My status is on file and use and it returns a 2 for me. Yet, I do see threes returned for some people. In fact, I see 0 (No info), 2 (No Info but Used(Weird)) and 3 (Info and used), but never 1 (Info filed). Were the bits repurposed and the docs not updated? --Clang Bailey 16:34, 29 January 2008 (PST)
- It is possible to remove the payment information from the file after it has been used. -- Strife Onizuka 20:24, 29 January 2008 (PST)