Difference between revisions of "Open Development User Group"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (removed old topics) |
(Why was STORM-968 closed?) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
# [https://jira.secondlife.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+%22Open+Development%22+AND+assignee+is+EMPTY+AND+status+%3D+%22Awaiting+Review%22++ORDER+BY+createdDate%2C+priority+DESC OPEN Issue Triage] ([[User:Oz Linden|Oz Linden]]) | # [https://jira.secondlife.com/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+%22Open+Development%22+AND+assignee+is+EMPTY+AND+status+%3D+%22Awaiting+Review%22++ORDER+BY+createdDate%2C+priority+DESC OPEN Issue Triage] ([[User:Oz Linden|Oz Linden]]) | ||
# Why was {{jira|STORM-968}} closed as "Won't finish"? ([[User:Boroondas Gupte|Boroondas Gupte]]) | |||
#* Please leave a comment on issues you're closing with this resolution, as it seems to be a catch-all for everything from "Can't be done", "Not worth it" to "Will/has become unnecessary by another (planned) change". | |||
<!--Add your topic before this line | <!--Add your topic before this line |
Revision as of 10:49, 6 April 2011
Open Source Policies, Resources for Open Contributions, and progressing contributions through the Snowstorm process.
Chaired by Oz Linden of the Snowstorm Team.
Agenda
The agenda for the next meeting is:
- OPEN Issue Triage (Oz Linden)
- Why was STORM-968 closed as "Won't finish"? (Boroondas Gupte)
- Please leave a comment on issues you're closing with this resolution, as it seems to be a catch-all for everything from "Can't be done", "Not worth it" to "Will/has become unnecessary by another (planned) change".
Archive
Records of past meetings: Open Development User Group/Archive
- See the list of other user groups.