Difference between revisions of "Talk:Second Life Railroad/SLRR standards"
Yevad Doobie (talk | contribs) (So called consensus called into question as a private group meeting should have no bearing on the future of the SLRR.) |
Yevad Doobie (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
...and what if an actual human wants to use the line rather than "controlled" rolling stock? And, why is a VRC meeting being used to dictate such things, the so-called "Community meeting". I do not recall an announcement on the Second Life blog, forums or anywhere else for a community meeting. The community is more than the VRC, which remains a private group. The SLRR is a resource for all | ...and what if an actual human wants to use the line rather than "controlled" rolling stock? And, why is a VRC meeting being used to dictate such things, the so-called "Community meeting". I do not recall an announcement on the Second Life blog, forums or anywhere else for a community meeting. The community is more than the VRC, which remains a private group. The SLRR is a resource for all residents, not a private group. I see this arrogant disregard for residents outside of the VCR continues, which doesn't surprise me.[[User:Yevad Doobie|Yevad Doobie]] 22:21, 12 June 2011 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:44, 12 June 2011
If you feel that the information about the SLRR standards are not correct or the text needs correction then please feel free to start a discussion on this page
control system discussion
Original text:
Control
is the way the rail network as a whole works safely while sharing the rail resources among consists.
Currently (10-2009) there is no such system in place.
- Problem description
- If rolling stock of multiple operators is allowed on a track, traffic control will be necessary. The block section type of control system should work, using llSay on a negative channel, phantom alpha detectors on the track, and signals for realism.
- A larger problem is what to do about traffic in the opposite direction. Block Section control could work with a passing siding for each section. Which leads to...
- Another problem - switches. If the Guide rail is used, then it could be turned and moved to divert a train, or line and branch Guides could be alternated between phantom and nonphysical as determined by routing. If a flat or phantom guide rail is used, names can be switched to change which rail is active.
--Stryker J 14:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
...and what if an actual human wants to use the line rather than "controlled" rolling stock? And, why is a VRC meeting being used to dictate such things, the so-called "Community meeting". I do not recall an announcement on the Second Life blog, forums or anywhere else for a community meeting. The community is more than the VRC, which remains a private group. The SLRR is a resource for all residents, not a private group. I see this arrogant disregard for residents outside of the VCR continues, which doesn't surprise me.Yevad Doobie 22:21, 12 June 2011 (PDT)